Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sara Loeffler

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Westminster, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1508181520 CMS profile 861180

193 Stoner Ave, Suite 100, Westminster, MD 21157

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$138,092

359 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sara Loeffler of Westminster, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $138,092 across 359 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $30,162 111
2024 General $49,334 120
2023 General $58,293 119
2022 General $12 1
2021 General $111 1
2020 General $136 5
2019 General $44 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sara Loeffler
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sara Loeffler were reported at $30,162. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Sara Loeffler Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $44 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $136 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $111 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $12 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $58,293 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $49,334 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $30,162 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $133,622 257 payments
  2. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $1,572 6 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $925 15 payments
  4. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $386 17 payments
  5. Dexcom, Inc. $249 3 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $242 18 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $124 1 payment
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $115 6 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $101 4 payments
  10. Corcept Therapeutics $92 2 payments
  11. Other $665 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $125,547 123 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $7,011 57 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $5,456 174 payments
  4. Education $78 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MOUNJARO $130,941 250 payments
  2. t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ $1,572 6 payments
  3. MINIMED 780G $872 14 payments
  4. RECORLEV $371 16 payments
  5. ZEPBOUND $164 10 payments
  6. TEPEZZA Inflammation/Rare Disease $143 12 payments
  7. DEXCOM G7 GSS (161) $138 2 payments
  8. TEPEZZA Tepezza $124 1 payment
  9. TZIELD $115 6 payments
  10. DEXCOM G6 TRANSMITTER $111 1 payment
  11. Other $1,138 46 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 72 drugs

Part D claims

4,492

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,640,837

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

66.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 400 $695,199
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 234 $411,471
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 192 $272,355
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 171 $130,584
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 53 $112,582
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 86 $93,794
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 76 $90,033
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 54 $76,952
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 39 $72,828
Humulin R U-500 Kwikpen Insulin Regular, Human Brand 32 $71,623

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 72 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$171,999

Of which drugs: $56,205

Medicare patients

613

Average age 73

Services billed

4,614

440 women, 173 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 61%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Osteoporosis 24%
Depression 23%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 31 2,700 $56,197

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
$47,106 234 —
RECORLEV
$87 — —
Korlym
$76 — —
UNITHROID
$66 — —
TZIELD
$35 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

359 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record