Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sara Collins

Cardiovascular Disease Bowie, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1023275229 CMS profile 740

16900 Science Dr Ste 200, Bowie, MD 20715

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$60,870

214 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$390,141 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Sara Collins of Bowie, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $60,870 across 214 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $390,141 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $42,577 48
2024 General $6,710 43
2023 General $484 12
2022 General $353 11
2021 General $8,247 27
2020 General $829 26
2019 General $1,670 47

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sara Collins
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sara Collins were reported at $42,577. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Sara Collins Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $1,670 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $829 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $8,247 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $353 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $484 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $6,710 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $42,577 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $29,257 30 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $7,595 8 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $7,542 20 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $6,347 15 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $3,820 13 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $1,577 21 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,401 25 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,032 12 payments
  9. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $362 8 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $228 11 payments
  11. Other $1,710 51 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $51,238 17 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $7,161 176 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,440 19 payments
  4. Education $31 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ELIQUIS $6,222 7 payments
  2. Repatha Cardiology $411 14 payments
  3. ENTRESTO $267 17 payments
  4. Confirm Rx Cardiac Rhythm Management $249 6 payments
  5. ONPATTRO $241 6 payments
  6. Corlanor $232 9 payments
  7. REPATHA Cardiovascular $223 7 payments
  8. Confirm Rx Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure $174 3 payments
  9. JOT DX $172 1 payment
  10. THORATEC HEARTMATE 3 LVAS IMPLANT KIT $165 2 payments
  11. Other $3,161 92 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

654

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$142,209

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 59 $51,228
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 21 $25,635
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 23 $25,601
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 27 $19,201
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 11 $9,437
Edarbi Azilsartan Medoxomil Brand 11 $2,696
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 61 $1,846
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 74 $1,311
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 125 $1,179
Ranolazine Er Ranolazine Brand 11 $1,153

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$64,061

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

166

Average age 76

Services billed

706

121 women, 45 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 42%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Heart failure 26%
Cancer 22%
Atrial fibrillation 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $76
$76 21 —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $35
$35 — —
OPSUMIT
  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $35
$35 — —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $33
$33 — —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $24
$24 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

214 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record