Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sanjay Rathi

Neurological Surgery North Haven, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1821007972 CMS profile 354771

14 Peck St, North Haven, CT 06473

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$540,826

1,277 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sanjay Rathi of North Haven, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $540,826 across 1,277 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Neurological Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $121,306 293
2024 General $133,376 310
2023 General $100,179 234
2022 General $93,166 182
2021 General $63,280 142
2020 General $13,437 49
2019 General $16,083 67

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sanjay Rathi
  • Neurological Surgery median
  • Middle half of Neurological Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sanjay Rathi were reported at $121,306. Among 5,467 Neurological Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $596 and the middle half received between $159 and $3,102.

Show as a table
Year Sanjay Rathi Neurological Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $16,083 $582 $138–$3,006 $163
2020 $13,437 $294 $76–$2,174 $114
2021 $63,280 $387 $105–$2,432 $132
2022 $93,166 $542 $139–$2,989 $149
2023 $100,179 $534 $145–$2,697 $160
2024 $133,376 $574 $155–$3,046 $164
2025 $121,306 $596 $159–$3,102 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EMD Serono, Inc. $195,824 332 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $141,804 327 payments
  3. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $63,665 85 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $59,451 56 payments
  5. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $23,997 50 payments
  6. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $10,229 8 payments
  7. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $7,720 20 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $7,334 51 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $7,214 15 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $4,451 14 payments
  11. Other $19,137 319 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $379,242 147 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $49,764 980 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $41,412 102 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $40,805 13 payments
  5. Honoraria $26,528 11 payments
  6. Education $3,076 24 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Mavenclad $177,143 99 payments
  2. BOTOX Neuroscience $100,674 94 payments
  3. INGREZZA $63,531 83 payments
  4. UBRELVY Neuroscience $47,462 159 payments
  5. QULIPTA $31,161 111 payments
  6. BOTOX Neuroscience $12,986 14 payments
  7. ZEPOSIA $11,970 61 payments
  8. Symbravo $10,229 8 payments
  9. UBRELVY Neuroscience $8,656 10 payments
  10. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $7,894 34 payments
  11. Other $55,496 488 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

1,068

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$924,463

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

56.3%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 38 $190,616
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 14 $119,875
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 101 $102,502
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 81 $100,291
Gocovri Amantadine Hcl Brand 23 $87,724
Nourianz Istradefylline Brand 24 $81,086
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 13 $74,599
Ongentys Opicapone Brand 78 $59,733
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 19 $41,991
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 23 $18,548

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$107,510

Of which drugs: $85,189

Medicare patients

71

Average age 73

Services billed

17,917

47 women, 24 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Depression 31%
Osteoporosis 24%
Cancer 21%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 21 17,611 $85,132

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Mavenclad
$40,848 — —
BOTOX
$29,131 81 17,611
INGREZZA
$26,807 14 —
ZEPOSIA
$9,334 — —
ONGENTYS
$7,351 78 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

1,277 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record