Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sang Baik

Internal Medicine Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1285732370 CMS profile 58394

266 S Harvard Blvd Ste 110, Los Angeles, CA 90004

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$23,564

1,078 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sang Baik of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $23,564 across 1,078 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,358 107
2024 General $2,601 116
2023 General $2,799 132
2022 General $3,505 157
2021 General $4,103 191
2020 General $3,155 157
2019 General $5,044 218

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sang Baik
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sang Baik were reported at $2,358. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Sang Baik Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $5,044 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,155 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $4,103 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,505 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,799 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,601 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,358 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,007 134 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,295 86 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,999 106 payments
  4. Amarin Pharma Inc. $1,703 60 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $1,462 62 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,402 68 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,227 67 payments
  8. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $956 41 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $942 43 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $890 43 payments
  11. Other $7,682 368 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $23,532 1,074 payments
  2. Education $32 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,445 61 payments
  2. CREON $1,143 48 payments
  3. LINZESS $1,109 47 payments
  4. Repatha $1,096 48 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,068 55 payments
  6. EVENITY $1,020 34 payments
  7. Ozempic $1,009 61 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $1,002 50 payments
  9. Vascepa $999 44 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $991 60 payments
  11. Other $19,385 926 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 239 drugs

Part D claims

43,447

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$6,577,800

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

30.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 1,124 $1,041,707
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 2,098 $740,453
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 728 $544,322
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 598 $520,425
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 561 $383,280
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 358 $265,418
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 292 $224,533
Prolia Denosumab Brand 133 $223,987
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 270 $175,852
Lidocaine Generic 1,104 $165,124

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 239 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 22 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$362,662

Of which drugs: $14,524

Medicare patients

770

Average age 82

Services billed

6,568

538 women, 232 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Osteoporosis 29%
Alzheimer's or dementia 17%
Heart failure 16%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 248 248 $8,955
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 67 67 $5,482
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 16 20 $19

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$310 598 —
BREZTRI
$225 27 —
AREXVY
$217 26 —
VOQUEZNA
$140 — —
LINZESS
$139 270 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,078 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record