Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Samuel Olaleye

Internal Medicine Newton, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1821006644 CMS profile 1098505

193 Northside Drive, Newton, MS 39345

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,231

182 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Samuel Olaleye of Newton, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,231 across 182 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $535 15
2024 General $460 22
2023 General $356 15
2022 General $223 12
2021 General $717 27
2020 General $397 20
2019 General $1,544 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Samuel Olaleye
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Samuel Olaleye were reported at $535. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Samuel Olaleye Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,544 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $397 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $717 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $223 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $356 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $460 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $535 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,046 60 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $707 50 payments
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $585 13 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $525 8 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $487 21 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $223 6 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $170 6 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $159 4 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $137 9 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $100 1 payment
  11. Other $94 4 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,962 172 payments
  2. Education $269 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $529 35 payments
  2. XARELTO $407 9 payments
  3. FARXIGA $369 17 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $334 25 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $314 20 payments
  6. JARDIANCE Diabetes $305 6 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $236 12 payments
  8. Kerendia $223 6 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $220 2 payments
  10. INVOKANA $213 7 payments
  11. Other $1,899 118 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 113 drugs

Part D claims

6,512

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,594,638

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

38.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 668 $753,008
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 219 $197,781
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 161 $176,720
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 168 $96,016
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 75 $85,320
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 79 $46,846
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 49 $43,203
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 37 $32,028
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 36 $23,474
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 31 $23,057

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 113 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$33,178

Of which drugs: $64

Medicare patients

88

Average age 70

Services billed

774

66 women, 22 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 41%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Depression 20%
Heart failure 17%
Ischemic heart disease 15%
Osteoporosis 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 23 60 $17
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 29 188 $15

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $125
  • Lilly USA, LLC $40
$164 219 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $67
$67 668 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $51
$51 37 —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $44
$44 — —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $39
$39 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

182 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record