Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Samuel Carter

Internal Medicine Joplin, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1760428973 CMS profile 306359

2024 Maiden Lane Ste 203, Joplin, MO 64804

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,485

810 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Samuel Carter of Joplin, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,485 across 810 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,619 98
2024 General $1,947 116
2023 General $1,876 126
2022 General $2,148 108
2021 General $1,852 156
2020 General $1,854 106
2019 General $1,189 100

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Samuel Carter
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Samuel Carter were reported at $1,619. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Samuel Carter Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,189 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,854 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,852 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,148 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,876 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,947 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,619 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,544 89 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,226 96 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $906 67 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $870 49 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $861 65 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $820 53 payments
  7. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $776 53 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $659 59 payments
  9. Baxter Healthcare $643 1 payment
  10. Welch Allyn $526 1 payment
  11. Other $3,653 277 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,279 806 payments
  2. Debt forgiveness $643 1 payment
  3. Gift $526 1 payment
  4. Education $37 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,036 82 payments
  2. BREZTRI $840 45 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $794 63 payments
  4. FreeStyle Libre $785 43 payments
  5. FARXIGA $687 33 payments
  6. TRINTELLIX $635 40 payments
  7. CardioPerfect PRO ECG Recorder $526 1 payment
  8. Livalo $494 59 payments
  9. Repatha $457 35 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $431 31 payments
  11. Other $10,697 789 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 144 drugs

Part D claims

16,132

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,348,778

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 234 $208,946
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 146 $187,955
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 196 $146,555
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 105 $120,056
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 115 $91,567
Arexvy Rsvpref3 Antigen/As01e/Pf Brand 249 $77,910
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 55 $57,648
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 59 $42,884
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 39 $42,574
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 16 $28,821

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 144 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$363,747

Of which drugs: $113,086

Medicare patients

829

Average age 75

Services billed

9,757

471 women, 358 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 60%
Diabetes 25%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Cancer 14%
Osteoporosis 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 148 148 $42,759
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 17 1,860 $37,996
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 352 352 $28,637
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 152 152 $3,329

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $204
$204 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $150
  • Lilly USA, LLC $13
$162 234 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $88
$88 59 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $85
$85 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $85
$85 146 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

810 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record