Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Samantha Mansfield

Pediatrics Tucson, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1598995334 CMS profile 71996

1501 N Campbell Ave, Department Of Pediatrics Room 3335, Tucson, AZ 85724

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,448

143 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Samantha Mansfield of Tucson, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,448 across 143 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $440 23
2024 General $425 22
2023 General $383 22
2022 General $346 19
2021 General $194 11
2020 General $269 17
2019 General $392 29

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Samantha Mansfield
  • Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Samantha Mansfield were reported at $440. Among 22,296 Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $97 and the middle half received between $37 and $210.

Show as a table
Year Samantha Mansfield Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $392 $86 $31–$183 $163
2020 $269 $49 $22–$110 $114
2021 $194 $68 $27–$158 $132
2022 $346 $77 $30–$173 $149
2023 $383 $88 $33–$190 $160
2024 $425 $94 $34–$206 $164
2025 $440 $97 $37–$210 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $435 22 payments
  2. Cranial Technologies, Inc $398 27 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $337 20 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $179 11 payments
  5. kaleo, Inc. $173 8 payments
  6. Corium, Inc. $132 7 payments
  7. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $122 7 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $89 10 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $82 4 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $67 4 payments
  11. Other $435 23 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,448 143 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GARDASIL 9 $408 20 payments
  2. Doc Band $398 27 payments
  3. VAXELIS $364 17 payments
  4. VAXNEUVANCE $356 17 payments
  5. BEXSERO $267 16 payments
  6. ROTATEQ $247 13 payments
  7. AUVI-Q $173 8 payments
  8. M-M-R II $168 8 payments
  9. VAQTA $162 8 payments
  10. GARDASIL $138 6 payments
  11. Other $1,603 94 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

143 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record