Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sam Daneshvari

Nephrology Glendale, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1851496145 CMS profile 129872

1505 Wilson Ter, Suite #155, Glendale, CA 91206

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,106

262 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,118,754 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Sam Daneshvari of Glendale, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,106 across 262 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,118,754 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $687 30
2024 General $1,177 48
2023 General $1,040 40
2022 General $592 23
2021 General $972 37
2020 General $525 30
2019 General $1,112 54

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sam Daneshvari
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sam Daneshvari were reported at $687. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Sam Daneshvari Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,112 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $525 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $972 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $592 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $1,040 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $1,177 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $687 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,296 64 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $783 32 payments
  3. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $567 31 payments
  4. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $412 15 payments
  5. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $400 11 payments
  6. Akebia Therapeutics Inc $344 17 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $281 11 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $267 9 payments
  9. Relypsa, Inc. $228 11 payments
  10. Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. $161 10 payments
  11. Other $1,366 51 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,827 256 payments
  2. Education $279 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LOKELMA $1,131 56 payments
  2. ACTHAR $412 15 payments
  3. LUPKYNIS $400 11 payments
  4. JYNARQUE $378 19 payments
  5. Auryxia $344 17 payments
  6. Kerendia $267 9 payments
  7. Parsabiv Nephrology $267 7 payments
  8. KRYSTEXXA $259 13 payments
  9. Parsabiv Nephrology $237 11 payments
  10. FARXIGA $232 10 payments
  11. Other $2,508 108 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

1,518

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$274,957

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

30.4%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 127 $86,196
Tolvaptan Generic 17 $70,686
Prosol Parenteral Amino Acid 20% No.1 Brand 175 $26,521
Procrit Epoetin Alfa Brand 13 $19,419
Sevelamer Hcl Generic 13 $17,515
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 21 $14,823
Dapagliflozin Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 17 $8,857
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 17 $7,472
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 13 $6,282
Febuxostat Generic 60 $4,633

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$656,520

Of which drugs: $5,450

Medicare patients

1,145

Average age 78

Services billed

9,444

526 women, 619 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 74%
Heart failure 67%
Depression 44%
Atrial fibrillation 41%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, darbepoetin alfa, 1 microgram (non-esrd use) J0881 Office 12 2,443 $5,294

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $209
$209 — —
LOKELMA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $139
$139 17 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $104
$104 127 —
JYNARQUE
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $100
$100 — —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $96
$96 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

262 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record