Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sakib Qureshi

Neurology Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1215105051 CMS profile 483353

1110 W Peachtree St Nw Ste 1100, Atlanta, GA 30309

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,052

560 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sakib Qureshi of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,052 across 560 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,906 85
2024 General $1,975 90
2023 General $2,199 113
2022 General $2,065 112
2021 General $1,082 71
2020 General $571 26
2019 General $1,254 63

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sakib Qureshi
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sakib Qureshi were reported at $8,906. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Sakib Qureshi Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,254 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $571 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $1,082 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $2,065 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $2,199 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $1,975 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $8,906 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $7,584 17 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,248 137 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,151 63 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $457 18 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $421 17 payments
  6. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $405 30 payments
  7. Biogen, Inc. $399 18 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $331 20 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $310 19 payments
  10. Lundbeck LLC $308 13 payments
  11. Other $4,438 208 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,710 549 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $6,300 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $972 2 payments
  4. Education $70 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $7,540 14 payments
  2. QULIPTA $1,436 84 payments
  3. AIMOVIG $854 50 payments
  4. UBRELVY $747 51 payments
  5. NUPLAZID $357 28 payments
  6. BOTOX Hyperhydrosis $353 17 payments
  7. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $335 15 payments
  8. Repatha $299 16 payments
  9. BRIUMVI $298 9 payments
  10. Briviact $283 12 payments
  11. Other $7,027 357 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 50 drugs

Part D claims

2,515

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$538,061

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

17.5%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 16 $491,936
Lacosamide Generic 23 $7,863
Memantine Hcl Generic 267 $5,083
Rivastigmine Generic 15 $3,845
Levetiracetam Generic 115 $2,835
Donepezil Hcl Generic 303 $2,422
Gabapentin Generic 209 $2,098
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 96 $1,740
Rivastigmine Rivastigmine Tartrate Brand 33 $1,675
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 12 $1,656

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 50 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 42 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$107,191

Of which drugs: $57,305

Medicare patients

290

Average age 75

Services billed

12,954

172 women, 118 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 60%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Diabetes 28%
Alzheimer's or dementia 23%
Depression 21%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 28 11,255 $55,900
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 11 1,004 $103

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $348
$348 — —
NUPLAZID
  • ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $162
$162 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $109
$109 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $105
$105 — 11,255
VYEPTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $96
$96 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

560 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record