Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sabrina Boyte

Physician Assistant Morehead City, NC Physician Assistant

NPI 1033284559 CMS profile 1276519

306 Medical Park Ct, Morehead City, NC 28557

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,309

147 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$1,745

Paid to them · 11 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sabrina Boyte of Morehead City, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,309 across 147 general payments and $1,745 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,484 11
2024 General $1,073 34
2024 Research $1,745 11
2023 General $1,485 54
2022 General $872 31
2021 General $394 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sabrina Boyte
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sabrina Boyte were reported at $2,484. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Sabrina Boyte Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $394 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $872 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $1,485 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $1,073 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $2,484 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Insulet Corporation $2,101 8 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $834 42 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $515 14 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $501 6 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $420 8 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $363 16 payments
  7. CeQur Corporation $140 2 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $135 8 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $124 1 payment
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $122 7 payments
  11. Other $1,053 35 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,309 142 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $2,000 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Omnipod $2,101 8 payments
  2. FreeStyle Libre 3 $469 26 payments
  3. Wegovy $398 7 payments
  4. FARXIGA $376 5 payments
  5. Kerendia $363 16 payments
  6. EVENITY $322 8 payments
  7. FreeStyle Libre 2 $297 11 payments
  8. Repatha $194 6 payments
  9. CeQur Simplicity $140 2 payments
  10. BREZTRI $125 1 payment
  11. Other $1,853 78 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,745 11 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 53 drugs

Part D claims

2,052

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$1,166,568

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

60.4%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 179 $315,779
Humulin R U-500 Kwikpen Insulin Regular, Human Brand 50 $86,142
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 49 $82,567
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 84 $78,360
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 47 $58,676
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 36 $49,975
Omnipod Dash Pods (Gen 4) Insulin Pump Cart,cont Inf,bt Brand 31 $49,006
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 32 $44,250
Xigduo Xr Dapaglifloz Propaned/Metformin Brand 38 $43,846
Omnipod 5 Dexg7g6 Pods (Gen 5) Insulin Pump Cart,auto,bt,g6/7 Brand 36 $42,982

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 53 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$32,132

Of which drugs: $14,206

Medicare patients

190

Average age 74

Services billed

2,996

116 women, 74 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 72%
Chronic kidney disease 56%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Depression 29%
Osteoporosis 24%
COPD 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 12 720 $14,113

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $137
$137 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $125
$125 84 —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $99
$99 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $95
$95 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $45
$45 47 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

158 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record