Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ryan Workman

Pain Medicine Saint George, UT Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1609103464 CMS profile 163212

1490 E Foremaster Dr, Ste 220, Saint George, UT 84790

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,250

437 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ryan Workman of Saint George, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,250 across 437 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $890 41
2024 General $1,091 78
2023 General $2,541 75
2022 General $1,070 102
2021 General $678 55
2020 General $469 47
2019 General $511 39

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ryan Workman
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ryan Workman were reported at $890. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Ryan Workman Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $511 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $469 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $678 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $1,070 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $2,541 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $1,091 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $890 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $2,300 177 payments
  2. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $1,670 14 payments
  3. Nevro Corp. $641 61 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $547 46 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $517 57 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $277 15 payments
  7. MML US, Inc. $202 3 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $160 9 payments
  9. Nalu Medical, Inc. $158 8 payments
  10. Lundbeck LLC $134 7 payments
  11. Other $646 40 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,108 435 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,142 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Intracept Pain $1,611 11 payments
  2. Intracept Pain $1,600 9 payments
  3. Intracept Pain $1,600 9 payments
  4. Intracept Pain $1,600 9 payments
  5. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $454 38 payments
  6. General - Pain Management $419 42 payments
  7. Omnia $414 50 payments
  8. GENERAL PAIN MANAGEMENT $361 24 payments
  9. Intracept Intracept Access Instruments (Gen 3)_NMOD $320 6 payments
  10. Octrode SCS Leads $312 39 payments
  11. Other $2,938 187 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

531

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$10,979

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Buprenorphine Generic 19 $3,324
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 72 $2,318
Gabapentin Generic 109 $1,114
Pregabalin Generic 59 $1,042
Fentanyl Generic 11 $664
Celecoxib Generic 28 $417
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 16 $406
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 22 $349
Cephalexin Generic 58 $312
Tramadol Hcl Generic 42 $257

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$558,527

Of which drugs: $16,836

Medicare patients

664

Average age 73

Services billed

12,567

368 women, 296 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 70%
Depression 29%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Heart failure 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, synvisc or synvisc-one, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7325 Office 16 1,152 $8,086
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 571 6,944 $5,319
Injection, fentanyl citrate, 0.1 mg J3010 Office 110 166 $118
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 64 732 $63
Injection, midazolam hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2250 Office 118 484 $51
Injection, ondansetron hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2405 Office 12 64 $5

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $67
$67 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $66
$66 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $50
$50 — —
VYEPTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $21
$21 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

437 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record