Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rupinder Chatha

Nephrology Houston, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1700856648 CMS profile 304411

915 Gessner Rd, #360, Houston, TX 77024

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,628

268 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$205,145 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Rupinder Chatha of Houston, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,628 across 268 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $205,145 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,224 73
2024 General $714 39
2023 General $793 36
2022 General $694 39
2021 General $343 15
2020 General $423 17
2019 General $437 49

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rupinder Chatha
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rupinder Chatha were reported at $1,224. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Rupinder Chatha Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $437 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $423 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $343 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $694 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $793 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $714 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $1,224 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $898 56 payments
  2. Relypsa, Inc. $657 59 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $540 28 payments
  4. Horizon Therapeutics plc $341 15 payments
  5. Retrophin, Inc. $291 15 payments
  6. OPKO Pharmaceuticals, LLC $273 24 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $215 11 payments
  8. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $202 9 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $187 8 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $160 8 payments
  11. Other $865 35 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,627 267 payments
  2. Education $1 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $898 56 payments
  2. Veltassa Hyperkalemia $364 45 payments
  3. FARXIGA $351 18 payments
  4. KRYSTEXXA $315 14 payments
  5. RAYALDEE $273 24 payments
  6. Veltassa Hyperkalemia $265 13 payments
  7. LOKELMA $189 10 payments
  8. ACTHAR $187 8 payments
  9. Fabhalta $153 8 payments
  10. TARPEYO $138 6 payments
  11. Other $1,197 52 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

1,095

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$279,318

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

20.9%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Veltassa Patiromer Calcium Sorbitex Brand 72 $76,119
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 65 $62,716
Rayaldee Calcifediol Brand 36 $46,073
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 24 $22,812
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 21 $19,912
Demeclocycline Hcl Generic 19 $15,886
Paricalcitol Generic 185 $12,516
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 11 $10,737
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 12 $5,063
Calcitriol Generic 105 $1,842

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$77,212

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

237

Average age 76

Services billed

1,140

137 women, 100 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 51%
Ischemic heart disease 50%
Arthritis 50%
Heart failure 35%
Atrial fibrillation 33%
Depression 27%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $202
$202 21 —
Veltassa
  • Relypsa, Inc. $64
$64 72 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $59
$59 24 —
FABRAZYME
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $35
$35 — —
RAYALDEE
  • OPKO Pharmaceuticals, LLC $27
$27 36 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

268 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record