Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rudolph Marciano

Neurological Surgery Bangor, ME Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1881968543 CMS profile 267565

417 State Street, Webber East, Ste 221, Bangor, ME 04401

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,947

42 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Rudolph Marciano of Bangor, ME is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,947 across 42 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 58th percentile of Neurological Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $860 5
2023 General $979 12
2022 General $2,954 20
2020 General $24 1
2019 General $130 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rudolph Marciano
  • Neurological Surgery median
  • Middle half of Neurological Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rudolph Marciano were reported at $0. Among 5,467 Neurological Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $596 and the middle half received between $159 and $3,102.

Show as a table
Year Rudolph Marciano Neurological Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $130 $582 $138–$3,006 $163
2020 $24 $294 $76–$2,174 $114
2021 $0 $387 $105–$2,432 $132
2022 $2,954 $542 $139–$2,989 $149
2023 $979 $534 $145–$2,697 $160
2024 $860 $574 $155–$3,046 $164
2025 $0 $596 $159–$3,102 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $2,113 15 payments
  2. MicroVention, Inc. $946 8 payments
  3. Stryker Corporation $940 12 payments
  4. Cordis US Corp. $772 2 payments
  5. Medtronic USA, Inc. $109 3 payments
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $46 1 payment
  7. CSL Behring $20 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Travel and Lodging $3,904 21 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $983 19 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $40 1 payment
  4. Education $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. RIST $1,884 11 payments
  2. WEB ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION SYSTEM $923 7 payments
  3. MYNX Venous VCD $772 2 payments
  4. EVEREST SPINAL SYSTEM $587 7 payments
  5. STENT Neurological Product $404 2 payments
  6. STENT Neurological Product $299 1 payment
  7. SPINEJACK $203 2 payments
  8. PIVOX Oblique Lateral Spinal System $143 1 payment
  9. STRYKER NAV3I $99 1 payment
  10. O-ARM-Spine $65 1 payment
  11. Other $210 9 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$56,781

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

108

Average age 70

Services billed

263

64 women, 44 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 62%
Depression 38%
Diabetes 35%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
COPD 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kcentra
  • CSL Behring $20
$20 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

42 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record