Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rowena Delos Santos

Nephrology Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1154448207 CMS profile 234273

4921 Parkview Pl, Div Im Nephrology, Ste 5C, Saint Louis, MO 63110

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$30,380

56 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$132,272 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Rowena Delos Santos of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $30,380 across 56 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $132,272 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $7,184 8
2024 General $2,822 7
2023 General $172 3
2022 General $121 1
2021 General $1,783 4
2020 General $5,480 13
2019 General $12,819 20

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rowena Delos Santos
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rowena Delos Santos were reported at $7,184. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Rowena Delos Santos Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $12,819 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $5,480 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $1,783 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $121 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $172 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $2,822 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $7,184 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $10,883 19 payments
  2. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $7,565 15 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $7,184 8 payments
  4. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $2,571 2 payments
  5. One Lambda, Inc. $1,500 1 payment
  6. Horizon Therapeutics plc $178 3 payments
  7. Retrophin, Inc. $128 2 payments
  8. Relypsa, Inc. $121 1 payment
  9. United Therapeutics Corporation $83 1 payment
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $68 1 payment
  11. Other $100 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $12,248 6 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $8,928 14 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,525 4 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $1,966 28 payments
  5. Honoraria $1,650 2 payments
  6. Education $63 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Envarsus Immunosuppressant $10,883 19 payments
  2. PROCYSBI $7,175 7 payments
  3. Envarsus Immunosuppressant $6,303 7 payments
  4. Soliris $4,115 10 payments
  5. TARPEYO $2,571 2 payments
  6. Ultomiris $1,078 3 payments
  7. KRYSTEXXA $178 3 payments
  8. Steen Solution $83 1 payment
  9. REZUROCK $68 1 payment
  10. ACTHAR $60 1 payment
  11. Other $49 3 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 61 drugs

Part D claims

6,747

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$258,734

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

12.9%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Envarsus Xr Tacrolimus Brand 52 $43,514
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 42 $37,824
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 35 $36,454
Valganciclovir Hcl Generic 183 $34,767
Nulojix Belatacept Brand 21 $28,887
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 12 $10,373
Tacrolimus Generic 92 $10,007
Atovaquone Generic 12 $5,971
Mycophenolic Acid Mycophenolate Sodium Brand 55 $4,724
Cinacalcet Hcl Generic 78 $4,334

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 61 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$89,604

Of which drugs: $2,307

Medicare patients

372

Average age 61

Services billed

2,100

159 women, 213 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 63%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Arthritis 42%
Heart failure 41%
Depression 28%
Atrial fibrillation 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TARPEYO
  • CALLIDITAS THERAPEUTICS US INC. $2,571
$2,571 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $22
$22 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

56 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record