Who Paid My Doc
Ronald Lo
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Loma Linda, CA Medical Doctor
NPI 1639271638 CMS profile 979471
11201 Benton St, Loma Linda, CA 92357
General payments
$625
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Research they led as principal investigator
$102,844
Through program year 2025, Ronald Lo of Loma Linda, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $625 across 9 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $102,844 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.
General payments for this record sit in the 6th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
5 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $55 | 2 | |
| 2024 | General | $503 | 3 | |
| 2023 | General | $27 | 1 | |
| 2022 | General | $16 | 1 | |
| 2019 | General | $24 | 2 |
Beside peers
- Ronald Lo
- Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
- Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Ronald Lo were reported at $55. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.
Show as a table
| Year | Ronald Lo | Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $24 | $2,361 | $585–$8,260 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $993 | $247–$4,351 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $1,185 | $326–$4,739 | $132 |
| 2022 | $16 | $2,073 | $554–$6,789 | $149 |
| 2023 | $27 | $2,568 | $759–$8,159 | $160 |
| 2024 | $503 | $2,557 | $703–$7,403 | $164 |
| 2025 | $55 | $2,462 | $733–$7,710 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Records
9 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in California
Shephal Doshi
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Santa Monica, CA
Jonathan Hsu
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · San Diego, CA
Leslie Saxon
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Los Angeles, CA
Rahul Bhardwaj
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Loma Linda, CA
Nicholas Olson
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · La Jolla, CA
Jonathan Dukes
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Ventura, CA
Related records
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in California
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in California
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.