Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ronald Glick

Dermatology Mesa, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1235134412 CMS profile 100709

3940 E University Dr, Mesa, AZ 85205

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$91,200

505 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ronald Glick of Mesa, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $91,200 across 505 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $11,113 102
2024 General $17,047 99
2023 General $12,202 99
2022 General $9,824 63
2021 General $6,013 34
2020 General $9,349 17
2019 General $25,652 91

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ronald Glick
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ronald Glick were reported at $11,113. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Ronald Glick Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $25,652 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $9,349 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $6,013 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $9,824 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $12,202 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $17,047 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $11,113 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $70,208 166 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $8,199 54 payments
  3. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $7,488 21 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $853 34 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $806 40 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $663 37 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $523 31 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $480 25 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $417 19 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $402 18 payments
  11. Other $1,162 60 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $70,665 34 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $10,271 431 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $4,800 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $3,260 24 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $1,800 1 payment
  6. Education $404 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI Immunology $51,728 97 payments
  2. SKYRIZI Immunology $9,563 21 payments
  3. SILIQ $7,465 19 payments
  4. COSENTYX Dermatology $7,331 13 payments
  5. TREMFYA $705 32 payments
  6. RINVOQ $595 29 payments
  7. ILUMYA $578 17 payments
  8. ADBRY $570 32 payments
  9. COSENTYX Dermatology $504 26 payments
  10. TALTZ $433 23 payments
  11. Other $4,939 250 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

1,274

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$536,396

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

4.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 14 $295,484
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 15 $167,133
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 13 $50,113
Fluorouracil Generic 109 $7,943
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 134 $5,378
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 600 $2,874
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 213 $1,805
Alclometasone Dipropionate Generic 25 $1,337
Metronidazole Generic 27 $1,304
Gentamicin Sulfate Generic 26 $877

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 91 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$682,857

Of which drugs: $17,605

Medicare patients

2,241

Average age 76

Services billed

9,055

1,145 women, 1,096 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 23%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Depression 17%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 57 60 $17,531
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 48 108 $74

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $15,758
$15,758 14 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $183
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $50
$233 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $139
$139 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $138
$138 — —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $53
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $36
  • SANOFI US SERVICES INC. $33
$122 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

505 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record