Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ronald Cathcart

Internal Medicine Melbourne, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1134142003 CMS profile 187107

1495 N Harbor City Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32935

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$150,467

294 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ronald Cathcart of Melbourne, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $150,467 across 294 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $15,072 34
2024 General $25,506 40
2023 General $12,311 30
2022 General $17,107 31
2021 General $5,102 26
2020 General $22,752 39
2019 General $52,617 94

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ronald Cathcart
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ronald Cathcart were reported at $15,072. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Ronald Cathcart Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $52,617 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $22,752 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $5,102 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $17,107 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $12,311 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $25,506 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $15,072 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $149,234 233 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $764 40 payments
  3. Janssen Products, LP $185 2 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $94 6 payments
  5. Theratechnologies Inc. $72 3 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $59 6 payments
  7. Napo Pharmaceuticals Inc $36 2 payments
  8. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $12 1 payment
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $12 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $113,323 61 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $25,587 59 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $6,186 170 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $5,240 2 payments
  5. Education $131 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biktarvy $90,535 109 payments
  2. Sunlenca $1,846 2 payments
  3. DOVATO $439 31 payments
  4. SYMTUZA $244 8 payments
  5. Epclusa $121 1 payment
  6. JULUCA $120 2 payments
  7. PIFELTRO $94 6 payments
  8. DELSTRIGO $94 6 payments
  9. TRIUMEQ $75 1 payment
  10. CABENUVA $64 3 payments
  11. Other $197 10 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 90 drugs

Part D claims

6,171

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$8,285,579

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

48.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 1,591 $6,202,801
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 208 $568,151
Prezcobix Darunavir/Cobicistat Brand 141 $350,618
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 101 $339,772
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 61 $204,636
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 45 $138,142
Genvoya Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen Brand 30 $118,725
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 31 $69,639
Darunavir Generic 33 $50,325
Evotaz Atazanavir Sulfate/Cobicistat Brand 23 $38,975

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 90 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 23 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$22,209

Of which drugs: $4,733

Medicare patients

81

Average age 63

Services billed

379

29 women, 52 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Chronic kidney disease 51%
Depression 38%
COPD 30%
Diabetes 26%
Arthritis 26%
Heart failure 17%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 11 11 $2,688
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 16 18 $1,295
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 12 12 $263

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Biktarvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $14,155
$14,155 1,591 —
DOVATO
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $66
$66 45 —
PIFELTRO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $25
$25 — —
DELSTRIGO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $25
$25 — —
CABENUVA
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $23
$23 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

294 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record