Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ronald Buckman

Sports Medicine Bolton, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1871561092 CMS profile 358057

921 Boston Tpke, Bolton, CT 06043

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,494

592 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ronald Buckman of Bolton, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,494 across 592 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,325 62
2024 General $1,882 66
2023 General $2,292 102
2022 General $1,907 91
2021 General $1,819 87
2020 General $2,370 91
2019 General $1,900 93

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ronald Buckman
  • Sports Medicine median
  • Middle half of Sports Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ronald Buckman were reported at $1,325. Among 1,257 Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $114 and the middle half received between $39 and $293.

Show as a table
Year Ronald Buckman Sports Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,900 $119 $35–$362 $163
2020 $2,370 $77 $24–$275 $114
2021 $1,819 $104 $28–$340 $132
2022 $1,907 $94 $31–$272 $149
2023 $2,292 $91 $34–$271 $160
2024 $1,882 $126 $38–$294 $164
2025 $1,325 $114 $39–$293 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,428 81 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,624 98 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,499 64 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,171 50 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,148 23 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $1,122 60 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $973 51 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $937 45 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $405 22 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $292 14 payments
  11. Other $1,895 84 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,978 590 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $512 1 payment
  3. Education $4 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,506 90 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,202 74 payments
  3. FARXIGA $1,087 22 payments
  4. Repatha $851 13 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $747 35 payments
  6. MOUNJARO $684 26 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $629 31 payments
  8. UBRELVY $582 27 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $489 19 payments
  10. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $460 21 payments
  11. Other $11,488 578 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 87 drugs

Part D claims

3,941

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$457,677

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 58 $108,003
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 59 $92,062
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 53 $67,073
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 20 $34,743
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 13 $32,847
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 12 $20,113
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 11 $16,875
Anoro Ellipta Umeclidinium Brm/Vilanterol Tr Brand 11 $15,419
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 16 $10,853
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 11 $7,505

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 87 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$26,555

Of which drugs: $2,519

Medicare patients

102

Average age 74

Services billed

1,348

37 women, 65 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 30%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 21%
Diabetes 19%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
COPD 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 13 13 $1,064
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 11 940 $90

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $222
$222 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $117
  • Lilly USA, LLC $51
$169 59 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $167
$167 20 —
JYNARQUE
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $147
$147 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $135
$135 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

592 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Sports Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record