Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ronald Aung-Din

Neurology Sarasota, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1215987912 CMS profile 327692

3501 Cattlemen Rd, Suite A, Sarasota, FL 34232

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$38,760

1,378 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,010 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2020

Through program year 2025, Ronald Aung-Din of Sarasota, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $38,760 across 1,378 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,010 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,695 332
2024 General $8,436 256
2023 General $7,486 269
2022 General $6,991 236
2021 General $3,516 130
2020 General $1,358 62
2019 General $2,279 93

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ronald Aung-Din
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ronald Aung-Din were reported at $8,695. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Ronald Aung-Din Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,279 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $1,358 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $3,516 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $6,991 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $7,486 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $8,436 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $8,695 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,577 149 payments
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $2,507 114 payments
  3. Biogen, Inc. $1,847 61 payments
  4. EMD Serono, Inc. $1,438 28 payments
  5. Eisai Inc. $1,403 42 payments
  6. Lundbeck LLC $1,313 57 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $1,252 52 payments
  8. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $1,179 46 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,141 59 payments
  10. SK Life Science, Inc. $1,139 45 payments
  11. Other $20,962 725 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $38,715 1,376 payments
  2. Education $45 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. QULIPTA $2,052 68 payments
  2. UBRELVY $1,783 65 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $1,330 37 payments
  4. ZEPOSIA $1,247 34 payments
  5. REXULTI $1,078 44 payments
  6. Austedo XR $1,077 43 payments
  7. OCREVUS $961 28 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT $926 37 payments
  9. Leqembi $892 25 payments
  10. Mavenclad $874 7 payments
  11. Other $27,691 1,077 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 96 drugs

Part D claims

4,057

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$2,004,180

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

35.5%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 13 $255,819
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 21 $176,489
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 108 $163,290
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 25 $151,556
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 14 $151,342
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 98 $147,957
Austedo Xr Deutetrabenazine Brand 14 $97,630
Horizant Gabapentin Enacarbil Brand 58 $92,365
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 40 $89,414
Wellbutrin Xl Bupropion Hcl Brand 13 $79,363

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 96 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$279,174

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

309

Average age 71

Services billed

1,583

182 women, 127 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 60%
Depression 43%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 22%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Osteoporosis 19%
Alzheimer's or dementia 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 54 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FYCOMPA
$449 65 —
QULIPTA
$418 17 —
CAPLYTA
$408 — —
ZEPOSIA
$400 — —
WAKIX
$378 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 54 with Patron

Records

1,378 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record