Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rohit Nathan

Transplant Hepatology Phoenix, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1528321437 CMS profile 2782494

1441 N 12Th St Fl 2, Fl 2, Phoenix, AZ 85006

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,026

45 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rohit Nathan of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,026 across 45 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 37th percentile of Transplant Hepatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $149 2
2023 General $171 7
2022 General $69 3
2021 General $174 10
2020 General $301 15
2019 General $163 8

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rohit Nathan
  • Transplant Hepatology median
  • Middle half of Transplant Hepatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rohit Nathan were reported at $149. Among 195 Transplant Hepatology profiles paid that year, the median was $499 and the middle half received between $124 and $5,839.

Show as a table
Year Rohit Nathan Transplant Hepatology median Middle half National median
2019 $163 $386 $98–$3,771 $163
2020 $301 $445 $42–$8,101 $114
2021 $174 $262 $82–$3,660 $132
2022 $69 $323 $125–$3,034 $149
2023 $171 $289 $96–$3,037 $160
2024 $0 $409 $110–$6,270 $164
2025 $149 $499 $124–$5,839 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $656 30 payments
  2. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals $129 1 payment
  3. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $59 4 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $47 2 payments
  5. Ardelyx, Inc. $32 2 payments
  6. Shionogi Inc $31 2 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $20 1 payment
  8. Abbott Laboratories $20 1 payment
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $16 1 payment
  10. Dynavax Technologies Corporation $16 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,026 45 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. REZDIFFRA $129 1 payment
  2. OCALIVA $40 3 payments
  3. IBSRELA $32 2 payments
  4. Mulpleta $31 2 payments
  5. MAVYRET $29 1 payment
  6. AMPERE $20 1 payment
  7. LINZESS $19 1 payment
  8. CREON $19 1 payment
  9. XIFAXAN $16 1 payment
  10. RELISTOR $16 1 payment
  11. Other $16 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

732

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$672,521

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 96 $340,964
Ocaliva Obeticholic Acid Brand 21 $290,202
Ursodiol Generic 77 $12,306
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 14 $9,768
Entecavir Generic 20 $9,109
Lactulose Generic 58 $3,090
Azathioprine Generic 37 $1,716
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 17 $1,287
Spironolactone Generic 81 $902
Mirtazapine Generic 17 $517

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$23,330

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

133

Average age 69

Services billed

278

80 women, 53 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 54%
Arthritis 47%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Heart failure 29%
Osteoporosis 26%
Depression 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

45 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Transplant Hepatology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record