Who Paid My Doc
Roger Cole
General Practice Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor
NPI 1235399882 CMS profile 10972
915 N Grand Blvd, Wohl Clinic Ste 241, Saint Louis, MO 63106
General payments
$919
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2021, Roger Cole of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $919 across 59 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
3 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | General | $155 | 10 | |
| 2020 | General | $428 | 28 | |
| 2019 | General | $337 | 21 |
Beside peers
- Roger Cole
- General Practice median
- Middle half of General Practice
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Roger Cole were reported at $0. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.
Show as a table
| Year | Roger Cole | General Practice median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $337 | $107 | $37–$285 | $163 |
| 2020 | $428 | $75 | $25–$213 | $114 |
| 2021 | $155 | $93 | $30–$272 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $103 | $36–$279 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $106 | $34–$276 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $114 | $39–$290 | $164 |
| 2025 | $0 | $106 | $35–$292 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drugPart D claims
14
Drug cost
$259
Branded share of claims
0%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diltiazem Hcl | Generic | 14 | $259 |
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Records
59 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other General Practice in Missouri
Arthur Greenberg
General Practice · Kansas City, MO
Robert Calaluce
General Practice · Columbia, MO
Suraiya Siddique
General Practice · Mount Vernon, MO
Rex Hudson
General Practice · Saint Louis, MO
Nadeemuddin Qureshi
General Practice · Saint Louis, MO
Laura Mueller
General Practice · Grant City, MO
Related records
General Practice in Missouri
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All General Practice
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Missouri
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.