Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robin Ostberg

Nurse Practitioner Birmingham, AL Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1790022341 CMS profile 10567739

805 Saint Vincents Dr, Suite 510, Birmingham, AL 35205

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,377

219 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Robin Ostberg of Birmingham, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,377 across 219 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $149 8
2024 General $257 14
2023 General $517 35
2022 General $685 43
2021 General $1,769 119

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robin Ostberg
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robin Ostberg were reported at $149. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Robin Ostberg Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,769 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $685 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $517 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $257 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $149 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $517 39 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $391 25 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $264 15 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $194 11 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $190 12 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $182 15 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $182 12 payments
  8. Eisai Inc. $154 12 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $151 9 payments
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $149 8 payments
  11. Other $1,004 61 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,377 219 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ozempic $341 21 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $341 21 payments
  3. UBRELVY $279 23 payments
  4. Vascepa $182 12 payments
  5. FARXIGA $161 8 payments
  6. MYRBETRIQ $154 13 payments
  7. Dayvigo $154 12 payments
  8. XIFAXAN $151 9 payments
  9. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $133 7 payments
  10. QULIPTA $129 10 payments
  11. Other $2,411 151 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

991

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$20,547

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

11.1%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 13 $10,970
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 117 $1,446
Cefdinir Generic 59 $1,237
Methylprednisolone Generic 117 $989
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 32 $754
Pantoprazole Sodium Generic 27 $443
Valsartan-Hydrochlorothiazide Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Brand 20 $369
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 18 $288
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 29 $287
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 11 $280

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 75 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$35,370

Of which drugs: $726

Medicare patients

381

Average age 73

Services billed

2,057

208 women, 173 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 66%
Chronic kidney disease 41%
Depression 39%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Diabetes 33%
COPD 23%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 23 27 $139
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 36 192 $57
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 14 17 $54
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 19 84 $28
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 54 82 $7
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 46 54 $5

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $29
$29 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $27
$27 — —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $27
$27 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $22
$22 — —
Azstarys
  • Corium, Inc. $21
$21 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

219 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record