Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robert Selfe

Internal Medicine Grand Rapids, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1003038605 CMS profile 272189

221 Michigan St Ne, Suite 200, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$238,201

388 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Robert Selfe of Grand Rapids, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $238,201 across 388 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $67,585 92
2024 General $36,726 80
2023 General $30,605 70
2022 General $63,339 85
2021 General $39,599 47
2020 General $225 8
2019 General $123 6

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robert Selfe
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robert Selfe were reported at $67,585. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Robert Selfe Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $123 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $225 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $39,599 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $63,339 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $30,605 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $36,726 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $67,585 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $155,497 229 payments
  2. Dexcom, Inc. $63,116 83 payments
  3. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $17,541 30 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $811 8 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $410 21 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $243 4 payments
  7. Sequel Med Tech, LLC $152 2 payments
  8. Beta Bionics, Inc. $138 1 payment
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $120 1 payment
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $80 5 payments
  11. Other $96 4 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $161,375 84 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $49,530 20 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $16,251 67 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $11,013 216 payments
  5. Education $32 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $79,092 133 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $67,853 114 payments
  3. DEXCOM G7 GSS (161) $50,070 59 payments
  4. t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ $17,491 29 payments
  5. DEXCOM STELO GLUCOSE BIOSENSOR $13,068 14 payments
  6. Dexcom G6 Transmitter Endocrinology $11,331 21 payments
  7. DEXCOM G6 TRANSMITTER Endocrinology $1,714 3 payments
  8. MINIMED 780G $694 7 payments
  9. Wegovy $247 20 payments
  10. BAQSIMI $178 7 payments
  11. Other $1,630 44 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

1,674

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,136,902

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

89.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 204 $248,667
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 138 $189,251
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 115 $184,265
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 87 $94,576
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 45 $55,777
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 53 $48,152
Humalog Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Lispro Brand 105 $42,306
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 33 $38,433
Lantus Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 203 $37,051
Humalog Kwikpen U-200 Insulin Lispro Brand 12 $29,049

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$15,199

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

117

Average age 67

Services billed

204

53 women, 64 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 54%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 50%
Heart failure 40%
Depression 39%
COPD 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $8,100
$8,100 115 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $5,222
$5,222 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $60
$60 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $52
$52 204 —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $50
$50 87 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

388 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record