Who Paid My Doc
Robert Schutz
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Rapid City, SD Medical Doctor
NPI 1477683324 CMS profile 202681
3615 5Th St, Suite 101, Rapid City, SD 57701
General payments
$875
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Robert Schutz of Rapid City, SD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $875 across 35 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 30th percentile of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
7 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $18 | 1 | |
| 2024 | General | $117 | 4 | |
| 2023 | General | $228 | 6 | |
| 2022 | General | $249 | 8 | |
| 2021 | General | $173 | 10 | |
| 2020 | General | $73 | 5 | |
| 2019 | General | $17 | 1 |
Beside peers
- Robert Schutz
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery median
- Middle half of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Robert Schutz were reported at $18. Among 2,070 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $442 and the middle half received between $150 and $1,242.
Show as a table
| Year | Robert Schutz | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $17 | $335 | $121–$1,264 | $163 |
| 2020 | $73 | $162 | $57–$417 | $114 |
| 2021 | $173 | $245 | $89–$735 | $132 |
| 2022 | $249 | $325 | $120–$932 | $149 |
| 2023 | $228 | $343 | $129–$999 | $160 |
| 2024 | $117 | $390 | $141–$1,085 | $164 |
| 2025 | $18 | $442 | $150–$1,242 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 2 drugsPart D claims
27
Drug cost
$152
Branded share of claims
0%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cefadroxil | Generic | 11 | $88 | |
| Gabapentin | Generic | 16 | $64 |
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 15,891 Part D prescribers listed as General Surgery; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Records
35 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Related records
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in South Dakota
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in South Dakota
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.