Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robert Ortiz

Nurse Practitioner Dothan, AL Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1851430383 CMS profile 10633986

1118 Ross Clark Cir Ste 303, Dothan, AL 36301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,495

668 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Robert Ortiz of Dothan, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,495 across 668 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,164 70
2024 General $2,163 159
2023 General $2,011 141
2022 General $2,003 135
2021 General $2,154 163

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robert Ortiz
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robert Ortiz were reported at $1,164. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Robert Ortiz Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $2,154 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $2,003 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $2,011 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $2,163 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,164 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $790 50 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $784 62 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $771 70 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $760 49 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $632 57 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $585 35 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $515 34 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $457 24 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $446 31 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $429 35 payments
  11. Other $3,326 221 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,495 668 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $607 34 payments
  2. Kerendia $585 35 payments
  3. Ozempic $529 42 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $525 41 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $379 33 payments
  6. Repatha $361 31 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $329 29 payments
  8. EVENITY $323 30 payments
  9. UBRELVY $317 20 payments
  10. VERQUVO $311 23 payments
  11. Other $8,298 594 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 93 drugs

Part D claims

3,528

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$291,880

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

21.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 15 $63,921
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 36 $36,825
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 47 $29,982
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 31 $25,880
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $24,225
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 17 $21,704
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 13 $15,142
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 20 $12,500
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 18 $10,071
Belsomra Suvorexant Brand 12 $5,367

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 93 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 53 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$53,949

Of which drugs: $7,507

Medicare patients

163

Average age 74

Services billed

5,640

88 women, 75 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Depression 20%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 26 26 $1,911
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 42 3,680 $365
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 14 14 $46
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 41 45 $39
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 63 294 $23

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 42 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $149
$149 — —
Qutenza
  • Averitas Pharma Inc. $135
$135 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $132
$132 47 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $126
$126 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $118
$118 17 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 42 with Patron

Records

668 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record