Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robert Friedman

Ophthalmology Sarasota, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1750327177 CMS profile 79639

2111 Bee Ridge Rd, Sarasota, FL 34239

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,094

355 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Robert Friedman of Sarasota, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,094 across 355 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,493 71
2024 General $2,407 50
2023 General $2,039 56
2022 General $1,255 50
2021 General $1,594 55
2020 General $881 38
2019 General $1,425 35

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robert Friedman
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robert Friedman were reported at $2,493. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Robert Friedman Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,425 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $881 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $1,594 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $1,255 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $2,039 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $2,407 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $2,493 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,115 80 payments
  2. Alcon Vision LLC $1,995 36 payments
  3. Sight Sciences, Inc. $1,622 42 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $1,418 73 payments
  5. TissueTech, Inc. $1,173 11 payments
  6. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $514 23 payments
  7. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $374 5 payments
  8. Ivantis, Inc $363 12 payments
  9. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $336 9 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $278 10 payments
  11. Other $1,905 54 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,123 351 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $826 2 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $100 1 payment
  4. Gift $45 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OMNI SURGICAL SYSTEM $1,355 28 payments
  2. DURYSTA Eye Care $942 37 payments
  3. SION SURGICAL INSTRUMENT $816 16 payments
  4. DURYSTA Glaucoma $767 40 payments
  5. HYDRUS Microstent Ophthalmology $653 16 payments
  6. DEXTENZA $492 22 payments
  7. Clareon $432 4 payments
  8. LUMIGAN $406 24 payments
  9. Hydrus Microstent Ophthalmic Surgery $363 12 payments
  10. Omidria $361 9 payments
  11. Other $5,396 181 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

3,190

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$400,273

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

55%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 450 $166,053
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 247 $74,950
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 33 $30,442
Difluprednate Generic 139 $14,043
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 28 $13,621
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 28 $9,952
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 95 $8,944
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 578 $8,286
Cosopt Pf Dorzolamide/Timolol/Pf Brand 14 $8,022
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 26 $7,707

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$358,524

Of which drugs: $38,963

Medicare patients

804

Average age 78

Services billed

3,803

455 women, 349 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 22%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Osteoporosis 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, bimatoprost, intracameral implant, 1 microgram J7351 Office 17 240 $38,936

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $200
$200 — 240
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $82
$82 450 —
DEXTENZA
  • Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $75
$75 — —
VEVYE
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $39
$39 — —
Omidria
  • Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited $25
$25 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

355 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record