Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robert Elder

Family Medicine Hartsville, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1154353787 CMS profile 278768

701 Medical Park Dr, 204, Hartsville, SC 29550

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,309

1,408 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Robert Elder of Hartsville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,309 across 1,408 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $750 31
2024 General $3,379 211
2023 General $3,163 199
2022 General $2,792 191
2021 General $3,660 273
2020 General $2,837 237
2019 General $2,727 266

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robert Elder
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robert Elder were reported at $750. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Robert Elder Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,727 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,837 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $3,660 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,792 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $3,163 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $3,379 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $750 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,358 174 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,537 125 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,400 136 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,178 63 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,005 71 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $907 68 payments
  7. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $895 57 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $787 60 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $776 66 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $704 49 payments
  11. Other $7,762 539 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,119 1,405 payments
  2. Education $190 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR $1,250 74 payments
  2. Ozempic $979 81 payments
  3. Linzess $908 56 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $811 64 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $702 51 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $649 50 payments
  7. FARXIGA $636 30 payments
  8. UBRELVY $570 46 payments
  9. XIFAXAN $537 38 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $502 49 payments
  11. Other $19,705 1,490 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 212 drugs

Part D claims

20,112

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,766,370

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

24.8%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 223 $213,104
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 160 $177,801
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 168 $155,676
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 100 $128,500
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 98 $81,615
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 75 $73,564
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 86 $72,982
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 13 $65,931
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 57 $57,420
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 54 $51,656

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 212 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 97 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$680,912

Of which drugs: $1,971

Medicare patients

708

Average age 75

Services billed

14,689

410 women, 298 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Diabetes 42%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Depression 36%
Alzheimer's or dementia 31%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Heart failure 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 48 48 $1,051
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 16 16 $578
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 77 1,056 $88
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 21 65 $56
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 67 $49

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 45 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$282 — —
MOUNJARO
$216 160 —
LINZESS
$201 57 —
NURTEC ODT
$154 — —
Qelbree
$145 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 45 with Patron

Records

1,408 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record