Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robert Bolen

Neurology Charleston, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1568751717 CMS profile 1371638

Medical University Of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Csb 301, Charleston, SC 29425

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$22,650

1,323 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Robert Bolen of Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $22,650 across 1,323 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,410 215
2024 General $4,360 197
2023 General $3,675 198
2022 General $3,661 216
2021 General $2,803 216
2020 General $1,665 143
2019 General $2,076 138

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robert Bolen
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robert Bolen were reported at $4,410. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Robert Bolen Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,076 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $1,665 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $2,803 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $3,661 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $3,675 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $4,360 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $4,410 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $1,764 99 payments
  2. Biogen, Inc. $1,511 81 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,469 139 payments
  4. SK Life Science, Inc. $1,286 60 payments
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,207 121 payments
  6. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $833 41 payments
  7. Eisai Inc. $789 43 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $784 43 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $725 46 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $717 33 payments
  11. Other $11,567 617 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,379 1,314 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $175 1 payment
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $69 5 payments
  4. Education $27 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TYSABRI $1,043 54 payments
  2. UBRELVY $894 95 payments
  3. Briviact $856 58 payments
  4. AIMOVIG $740 40 payments
  5. AJOVY $648 59 payments
  6. QULIPTA $639 64 payments
  7. Leqembi $620 30 payments
  8. INGREZZA $597 31 payments
  9. NUPLAZID $580 26 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $575 28 payments
  11. Other $16,399 914 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 60 drugs

Part D claims

3,545

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$685,468

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

27.5%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 25 $148,168
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 44 $71,827
Nourianz Istradefylline Brand 39 $71,772
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 41 $55,185
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 30 $41,967
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 37 $38,903
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 27 $37,714
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 21 $33,111
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 38 $29,423
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 14 $23,815

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 60 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,064,226

Of which drugs: $790,414

Medicare patients

923

Average age 75

Services billed

69,777

538 women, 385 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 56%
Diabetes 32%
Depression 30%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Alzheimer's or dementia 25%
Osteoporosis 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 30 15,600 $74,779
Injection, donanemab-azbt, 2 mg J0175 Office 14 7,350 $23,591

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 42 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Gocovri
$381 — —
PANZYGA
$273 — —
Leqembi
$228 — —
VYEPTI
$204 — —
INGREZZA
$182 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 42 with Patron

Records

1,323 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record