Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Richard Silver

Rheumatology Charleston, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1275641219 CMS profile 284394

171 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$82,249

82 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,542,864 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Richard Silver of Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $82,249 across 82 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,542,864 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,986 14
2024 General $6,918 8
2023 General $14 1
2022 General $1,498 2
2021 General $16,437 6
2020 General $27,597 7
2019 General $26,799 44

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Richard Silver
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Richard Silver were reported at $2,986. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Richard Silver Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $26,799 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $27,597 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $16,437 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,498 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $14 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $6,918 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,986 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $62,146 29 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $6,718 7 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $6,562 12 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $3,962 3 payments
  5. CSL Behring $2,020 12 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $400 2 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $161 9 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $126 3 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $75 2 payments
  10. Genentech, Inc. $50 1 payment
  11. Other $30 2 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $66,850 13 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $8,200 8 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $5,171 19 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $1,920 40 payments
  5. Education $107 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OFEV Respiratory $25,880 19 payments
  2. ORENCIA $6,562 12 payments
  3. OFEV Respiratory $3,647 2 payments
  4. Privigen $2,020 12 payments
  5. Adempas $400 2 payments
  6. OFEV Oncology $315 1 payment
  7. BENLYSTA $126 3 payments
  8. RINVOQ $84 6 payments
  9. SKYRIZI $77 3 payments
  10. TREMFYA $75 2 payments
  11. Other $80 3 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

954

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,641,040

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

48.8%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 119 $1,064,563
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 18 $204,549
Gammaked Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 17 $188,327
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 31 $184,599
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 28 $169,611
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 28 $153,785
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 21 $152,119
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 15 $142,999
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 13 $90,532
Orencia Abatacept Brand 13 $88,478

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$193,902

Of which drugs: $143,732

Medicare patients

343

Average age 72

Services billed

19,169

263 women, 80 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 73%
Osteoporosis 42%
Depression 26%
Heart failure 22%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Diabetes 20%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 14 840 $17,096
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 11 8,250 $7,097

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Adempas
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $200
$200 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

82 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record