Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Richard Nathan

Infectious Disease Idaho Falls, ID Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1942229570 CMS profile 959536

3614 Washington Pkwy, Idaho Falls, ID 83404

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,086

111 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$44,824

Paid to them · 25 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,369,289 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Richard Nathan of Idaho Falls, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,086 across 111 general payments and $44,824 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,369,289 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

11 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $170 4
2024 General $133 6
2024 Research $45 1
2023 General $73 4
2023 Research $2,030 9
2022 General $191 10
2022 Research $41,292 14
2021 General $423 28
2021 Research $1,458 1
2020 General $371 31
2019 General $3,726 28

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Richard Nathan
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Richard Nathan were reported at $170. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Richard Nathan Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $3,726 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $371 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $423 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $191 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $73 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $133 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $170 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $2,073 5 payments
  2. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $1,479 12 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $317 25 payments
  4. Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. $240 11 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $228 26 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $189 11 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $143 3 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $112 5 payments
  9. Insmed, Inc. $80 2 payments
  10. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $56 2 payments
  11. Other $169 9 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Travel and Lodging $2,941 8 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $2,010 99 payments
  3. Education $136 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NO PRODUCT DISCUSSED $1,479 12 payments
  2. AVYCAZ $243 24 payments
  3. Orbactiv $240 11 payments
  4. Vabomere $240 11 payments
  5. DALVANCE $178 17 payments
  6. ZERBAXA $169 10 payments
  7. TEFLARO $129 11 payments
  8. RECARBRIO $84 5 payments
  9. Arikayce $80 2 payments
  10. DIFICID $66 4 payments
  11. Other $398 22 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. First Wave BioPharma, Inc. $42,750 15 payments
  2. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $2,030 9 payments
  3. Sanofi US Services Inc. $45 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

378

Median for Infectious Disease: 268

Drug cost

$45,685

Median for Infectious Disease: $217,595

Branded share of claims

47.6%

Median for Infectious Disease: 45.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Daptomycin Generic 54 $25,805
Ertapenem Ertapenem Sodium Brand 25 $13,847
Sodium Chloride 0.9 % Sodium Chloride Brand 47 $1,411
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim Brand 52 $1,168
Cefdinir Generic 11 $886
Clindamycin Hcl Generic 30 $532
Fluconazole Generic 38 $440
Cephalexin Generic 33 $424
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 36 $405
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav Brand 20 $329

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,546 Part D prescribers listed as Infectious Disease; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$68,723

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

193

Average age 72

Services billed

1,283

80 women, 113 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 66%
Diabetes 50%
Chronic kidney disease 45%
Depression 41%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
COPD 31%
Heart failure 30%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cresemba
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $55
$55 — —
TEFLARO
  • AbbVie, Inc. $14
$14 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

136 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record