Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Richard Fuhler

Internal Medicine Mobile, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1922110535 CMS profile 1214959

3173A Dauphin St, Mobile, AL 36606

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,504

284 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Richard Fuhler of Mobile, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,504 across 284 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $214 9
2024 General $465 25
2023 General $1,076 63
2022 General $733 49
2021 General $348 26
2020 General $647 50
2019 General $1,019 62

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Richard Fuhler
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Richard Fuhler were reported at $214. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Richard Fuhler Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,019 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $647 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $348 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $733 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,076 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $465 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $214 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Neos Therapeutics, LP $970 72 payments
  2. Corium, Inc. $892 45 payments
  3. Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc. $696 32 payments
  4. Tris Pharma Inc $567 21 payments
  5. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $383 35 payments
  6. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $249 17 payments
  7. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $242 26 payments
  8. Adlon Therapeutics L.P. $232 20 payments
  9. Shire North American Group Inc $190 11 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $36 2 payments
  11. Other $48 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,504 284 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Azstarys $892 45 payments
  2. Adzenys XR-ODT $855 64 payments
  3. VYVANSE $481 35 payments
  4. Jornay PM 20mg capsules (Bottle of 100) $304 8 payments
  5. Dyanavel XR Adhd $274 15 payments
  6. JORNAY PM $258 17 payments
  7. ADHANSIA XR $232 20 payments
  8. QELBREE $181 16 payments
  9. Zenzedi $179 20 payments
  10. Dyanavel XR Adhd $170 5 payments
  11. Other $898 66 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 3 drugs

Part D claims

69

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$5,601

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

78.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Generic 15 $3,475
Dextroamphetamine-Amphet Er Dextroamphetamine/Amphetamine Brand 30 $1,554
Dextroamphetamine-Amphetamine Dextroamphetamine/Amphetamine Brand 24 $573

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Azstarys
  • Corium, Inc. $333
$333 — —
Adzenys XR-ODT
  • Neos Therapeutics, LP $52
$52 — —
Dyanavel XR
  • Tris Pharma Inc $41
$41 — —
JORNAY PM
  • Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc. $40
$40 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

284 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record