Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Richard Fried

Dermatology Yardley, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1801835426 CMS profile 217461

903 Floral Vale Blvd, Yardley, PA 19067

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$36,507

341 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$6,349

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$77,334 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Richard Fried of Yardley, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $36,507 across 341 general payments and $6,349 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $77,334 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,765 24
2024 General $4,975 43
2023 General $5,406 39
2022 General $1,583 73
2021 General $8,663 58
2021 Research $6,062 3
2020 General $10,092 27
2019 General $2,022 77
2019 Research $287 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Richard Fried
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Richard Fried were reported at $3,765. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Richard Fried Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,022 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $10,092 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $8,663 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,583 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $5,406 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $4,975 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,765 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $7,542 4 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $6,653 8 payments
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $5,614 11 payments
  4. Almirall LLC $5,510 4 payments
  5. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $3,732 10 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $1,695 93 payments
  7. Merz North America, Inc. $959 12 payments
  8. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $644 27 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $621 45 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $423 15 payments
  11. Other $3,114 112 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $22,660 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $8,576 329 payments
  3. Honoraria $5,200 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $46 1 payment
  5. Education $25 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Seysara $5,500 3 payments
  2. Winlevi $5,491 5 payments
  3. Zoryve $3,042 3 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $1,218 55 payments
  5. TREMFYA $765 40 payments
  6. ASCLERA $525 8 payments
  7. Xeomin $525 8 payments
  8. HUMIRA $335 22 payments
  9. TALTZ $312 14 payments
  10. Otezla $283 4 payments
  11. Other $5,137 236 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Almirall LLC $6,062 3 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $287 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

1,082

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$167,764

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

9.6%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 12 $62,850
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 13 $62,541
Ivermectin Generic 66 $9,039
Pimozide Generic 83 $7,737
Fluorouracil Generic 100 $5,437
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 147 $3,909
Pimecrolimus Generic 17 $2,714
Tacrolimus Generic 26 $2,198
Betamethasone Valerate Generic 19 $1,368
Minoxidil Generic 144 $1,266

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$239,491

Of which drugs: $25,220

Medicare patients

794

Average age 74

Services billed

4,370

356 women, 438 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 19%
Cancer 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 59 83 $25,207
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 11 18 $13

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $229
$229 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $159
$159 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $137
$137 — —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $134
$134 — —
OPZELURA
  • Incyte Corporation $106
$106 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

345 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record