Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ricardo Hernandez

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Miami, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1235494402 CMS profile 1392663

3641 S Miami Ave Ste 221, Miami, FL 33133

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$60,423

571 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ricardo Hernandez of Miami, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $60,423 across 571 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,217 111
2024 General $14,206 113
2023 General $12,353 89
2022 General $10,825 96
2021 General $6,244 78
2020 General $4,485 46
2019 General $2,092 38

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ricardo Hernandez
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ricardo Hernandez were reported at $10,217. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Ricardo Hernandez Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,092 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $4,485 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $6,244 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $10,825 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $12,353 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $14,206 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $10,217 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $37,243 292 payments
  2. Biotronik Inc. $7,854 48 payments
  3. Atricure, Inc. $5,868 51 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $2,634 71 payments
  5. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $2,246 19 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $1,723 33 payments
  7. Aziyo Biologics, Inc. $1,080 16 payments
  8. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $602 7 payments
  9. Biosense Webster, Inc. $398 9 payments
  10. Kestra Medical Technology Services, Inc. $149 3 payments
  11. Other $625 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $32,689 530 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $14,150 6 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $13,566 34 payments
  4. Education $17 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ENSITE Electrophysiology $14,431 26 payments
  2. BioMonitor $5,485 24 payments
  3. Solia $4,755 16 payments
  4. Acticor 7 VR-T DX $4,488 14 payments
  5. ENSITE Structural Heart $4,226 32 payments
  6. Rivacor 7 DR-T $3,960 8 payments
  7. EPI-SENSE GUIDED COAGULATION SYSTEM WITH VISITRAX $3,868 49 payments
  8. Edora 8 DR-T $3,836 7 payments
  9. AVEIR $2,234 23 payments
  10. SYNERGY ABLATION SYSTEM $2,000 2 payments
  11. Other $31,241 443 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

935

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$305,007

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

40.4%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 163 $183,599
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 77 $86,312
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 14 $13,951
Propafenone Hcl Er Propafenone Hcl Brand 18 $5,400
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 253 $4,114
Dofetilide Generic 25 $2,957
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 55 $2,694
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 61 $1,809
Flecainide Acetate Generic 24 $895
Acebutolol Hcl Generic 13 $816

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$159,454

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,908

Average age 75

Services billed

4,316

883 women, 1,025 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Ischemic heart disease 51%
Atrial fibrillation 47%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Heart failure 41%
Diabetes 40%
Depression 27%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $41
$41 — —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $35
$35 77 —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $26
$26 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

571 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record