Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rex Largen

Dermatology Lincoln, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1326036112 CMS profile 331972

5533 S 27Th Street, Suite 103, Lincoln, NE 68512

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,684

1,377 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$698,857 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2023–2025

Through program year 2025, Rex Largen of Lincoln, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,684 across 1,377 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $698,857 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,885 240
2024 General $4,049 228
2023 General $4,001 241
2022 General $3,620 235
2021 General $2,570 173
2020 General $3,775 141
2019 General $1,783 119

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rex Largen
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rex Largen were reported at $5,885. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Rex Largen Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,783 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $3,775 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $2,570 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $3,620 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $4,001 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $4,049 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $5,885 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $4,245 71 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $4,081 234 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,546 164 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,718 91 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,566 90 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,512 83 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,398 84 payments
  8. Mayne Pharma Inc. $1,109 65 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $1,102 56 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $1,076 105 payments
  11. Other $5,332 334 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,158 1,366 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $2,923 2 payments
  3. Education $603 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bimzelx $2,111 36 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $2,044 119 payments
  3. TREMFYA $2,012 118 payments
  4. TALTZ $1,685 89 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,397 71 payments
  6. RINVOQ $1,230 67 payments
  7. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $1,188 69 payments
  8. HUMIRA $913 56 payments
  9. ILUMYA $889 58 payments
  10. Otezla $831 48 payments
  11. Other $13,847 976 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 42 drugs

Part D claims

2,436

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$924,829

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

10%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 16 $322,421
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 17 $254,808
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 14 $96,704
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 12 $88,271
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 12 $52,997
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 11 $46,074
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 344 $8,800
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 152 $5,841
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 90 $5,830
Tacrolimus Generic 58 $5,029

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 42 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$326,117

Of which drugs: $1,424

Medicare patients

1,512

Average age 75

Services billed

8,737

757 women, 755 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 20%
Cancer 17%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Depression 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 66 278 $188

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$416 23 —
SKYRIZI
$402 16 —
TREMFYA
$340 17 —
VTAMA
$320 — —
COSENTYX
$274 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

1,377 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record