Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Renata Peyreau

Nurse Practitioner Whitehouse, TX Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1316188758 CMS profile 10811458

15632 State Highway 110 S, 19, Whitehouse, TX 75791

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,077

308 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Renata Peyreau of Whitehouse, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,077 across 308 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,010 49
2024 General $853 62
2023 General $692 40
2022 General $839 64
2021 General $1,684 93

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Renata Peyreau
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Renata Peyreau were reported at $1,010. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Renata Peyreau Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,684 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $839 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $692 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $853 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,010 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,051 73 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $620 19 payments
  3. Horizon Therapeutics plc $454 31 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $416 44 payments
  5. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $314 21 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $295 16 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $278 19 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $233 16 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $192 5 payments
  10. Amarin Pharma Inc. $173 12 payments
  11. Other $1,048 52 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,051 306 payments
  2. Education $26 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Repatha Cardiology $640 48 payments
  2. Otezla $535 51 payments
  3. KRYSTEXXA $454 31 payments
  4. LEQVIO $321 38 payments
  5. Kerendia $314 21 payments
  6. Wegovy $268 4 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $239 9 payments
  8. STEGLATRO $233 16 payments
  9. QULIPTA $193 10 payments
  10. REPATHA Cardiovascular $190 13 payments
  11. Other $2,792 167 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 70 drugs

Part D claims

2,468

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$530,059

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

28.6%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 180 $259,622
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 79 $99,392
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 51 $63,922
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 35 $27,017
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 23 $20,442
Repatha Pushtronex Evolocumab Brand 12 $18,221
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 14 $13,485
Testosterone Cypionate Generic 52 $3,265
Progesterone Progesterone, Micronized Brand 59 $1,846
Valsartan Generic 67 $1,278

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 70 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$60,291

Of which drugs: $1,606

Medicare patients

273

Average age 72

Services billed

59,263

163 women, 110 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Diabetes 20%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Depression 14%
Atrial fibrillation 11%
COPD 10%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, testosterone cypionate, 1 mg J1071 Office 30 54,003 $626
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 26 338 $307
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 28 2,247 $187
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 16 17 $100
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 44 242 $72
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 39 449 $35

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $223
$223 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $149
$149 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $126
$126 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $91
$91 35 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $51
$51 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

308 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record