Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Reimus Valencia

Allergy & Immunology Phoenix, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1346690518 CMS profile 2659239

6970 E Chauncey Ln Ste 100, Phoenix, AZ 85054

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,530

521 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$34,144 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2025, Reimus Valencia of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,530 across 521 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $34,144 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Allergy & Immunology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,757 154
2024 General $3,226 113
2023 General $1,518 44
2022 General $2,315 95
2021 General $1,213 59
2020 General $713 27
2019 General $788 29

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Reimus Valencia
  • Allergy & Immunology median
  • Middle half of Allergy & Immunology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Reimus Valencia were reported at $4,757. Among 2,466 Allergy & Immunology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,140 and the middle half received between $272 and $2,892.

Show as a table
Year Reimus Valencia Allergy & Immunology median Middle half National median
2019 $788 $594 $163–$1,512 $163
2020 $713 $426 $106–$1,233 $114
2021 $1,213 $638 $157–$1,708 $132
2022 $2,315 $790 $205–$1,961 $149
2023 $1,518 $852 $220–$2,147 $160
2024 $3,226 $865 $203–$2,267 $164
2025 $4,757 $1,140 $272–$2,892 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,144 67 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $1,558 49 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,422 66 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,000 30 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $800 39 payments
  6. OptiNose US, Inc. $778 26 payments
  7. CSL Behring $755 26 payments
  8. Grifols USA, LLC $550 21 payments
  9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $515 31 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $487 13 payments
  11. Other $4,521 153 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,243 510 payments
  2. Education $193 6 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $94 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $2,472 85 payments
  2. TEZSPIRE $1,045 23 payments
  3. NUCALA $788 37 payments
  4. Xhance $778 26 payments
  5. AIRSUPRA $681 14 payments
  6. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $647 18 payments
  7. Hizentra $484 19 payments
  8. FASENRA $479 16 payments
  9. XOLAIR $447 25 payments
  10. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $380 24 payments
  11. Other $6,734 254 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

243

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$44,131

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

32.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 27 $23,041
Xhance Fluticasone Propionate Brand 11 $7,048
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 14 $5,031
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 12 $4,630
Ipratropium Bromide Generic 49 $1,546
Azelastine Hcl Generic 28 $1,380
Fluticasone Propionate Generic 31 $901
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 14 $346
Montelukast Sodium Generic 31 $143
Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride Generic 13 $43

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$38,431

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

124

Average age 73

Services billed

2,749

81 women, 43 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 56%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Osteoporosis 27%
Depression 23%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Cancer 19%
COPD 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $448
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $221
$668 — —
NUCALA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $368
$368 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $289
$289 — —
TEZSPIRE
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $191
  • Amgen Inc. $15
$206 — —
Hizentra
  • CSL Behring $187
$187 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

521 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Allergy & Immunology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record