Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Reekesh Patel

Pain Medicine Hawthorne, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1043446982 CMS profile 819901

4477 W 118Th St Ste 501, Ste 501, Hawthorne, CA 90250

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,583

594 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$230 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2020

Through program year 2025, Reekesh Patel of Hawthorne, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,583 across 594 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $230 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,117 89
2024 General $2,419 86
2023 General $4,339 136
2022 General $3,763 143
2021 General $1,697 57
2020 General $1,712 59
2019 General $1,535 24

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Reekesh Patel
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Reekesh Patel were reported at $2,117. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Reekesh Patel Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,535 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $1,712 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $1,697 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $3,763 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $4,339 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $2,419 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $2,117 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $12,736 465 payments
  2. Medtronic USA, Inc. $2,152 55 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $708 15 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $500 20 payments
  5. Nalu Medical, Inc. $486 17 payments
  6. Painteq LLC $429 5 payments
  7. Stryker Corporation $163 1 payment
  8. Pfizer Inc. $97 4 payments
  9. Kyocera Medical Technologies, Inc. $95 1 payment
  10. Nevro Corp. $86 5 payments
  11. Other $131 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,583 594 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $10,307 394 payments
  2. INTELLIS Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $1,630 44 payments
  3. INTELLIS Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $1,334 47 payments
  4. VANTA ADAPTIVESTIM $568 5 payments
  5. Nalu Neurostimulation System $486 17 payments
  6. PAINTEQ $429 5 payments
  7. GENERAL PAIN MANAGEMENT $418 6 payments
  8. TARGETSTIM $285 3 payments
  9. Accurian $266 8 payments
  10. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $215 4 payments
  11. Other $1,464 56 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$199,710

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

323

Average age 65

Services billed

2,564

218 women, 105 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 54%
COPD 40%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Depression 33%
Heart failure 30%
Chronic kidney disease 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

594 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record