Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rebecca Callis

Rheumatology Florence, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1659597755 CMS profile 166425

6909A Burlington Pike, Florence, KY 41042

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$271,537

807 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rebecca Callis of Florence, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $271,537 across 807 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $50,966 117
2024 General $40,341 114
2023 General $42,887 160
2022 General $26,988 143
2021 General $30,568 87
2020 General $24,492 60
2019 General $55,296 126

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rebecca Callis
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rebecca Callis were reported at $50,966. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Rebecca Callis Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $55,296 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $24,492 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $30,568 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $26,988 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $42,887 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $40,341 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $50,966 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $132,458 169 payments
  2. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $109,359 92 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $18,116 119 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $6,294 40 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,603 191 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $1,014 57 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $601 21 payments
  8. Horizon Therapeutics plc $322 8 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $245 11 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $234 7 payments
  11. Other $1,291 92 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $208,334 96 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $25,546 61 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $24,670 15 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $12,728 629 payments
  5. Education $259 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SIMPONI ARIA $191,366 204 payments
  2. TREMFYA $179,433 179 payments
  3. STELARA $106,903 105 payments
  4. REMICADE $9,134 17 payments
  5. RINVOQ $8,726 77 payments
  6. HUMIRA $5,378 36 payments
  7. Cimzia $1,084 153 payments
  8. COSENTYX $523 23 payments
  9. Bimzelx $519 38 payments
  10. TALTZ $346 15 payments
  11. Other $4,327 246 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

2,144

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$899,906

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

39.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 12 $305,963
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 19 $142,326
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 15 $109,262
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 15 $101,763
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 11 $69,608
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 14 $67,227
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 11 $63,485
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 685 $13,620
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 152 $4,991
Sulfasalazine Generic 128 $4,395

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$803,086

Of which drugs: $703,226

Medicare patients

220

Average age 73

Services billed

38,174

157 women, 63 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Osteoporosis 35%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Depression 30%
COPD 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 28 14,400 $488,290
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 13 10,350 $88,121
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 19 1,980 $39,189

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$28,963 — —
SIMPONI ARIA
$10,098 — 10,350
Bimzelx
$179 — —
Cimzia
$166 — —
OMVOH
$131 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

807 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record