Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Raphael Castillo

Ophthalmology New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1770664294 CMS profile 352602

125 W 79Th St, New York, NY 10024

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,499

149 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Raphael Castillo of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,499 across 149 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,972 50
2024 General $1,958 32
2023 General $1,245 15
2022 General $1,064 20
2021 General $215 8
2020 General $256 4
2019 General $789 20

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Raphael Castillo
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Raphael Castillo were reported at $2,972. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Raphael Castillo Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $789 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $256 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $215 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $1,064 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,245 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,958 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $2,972 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $1,352 15 payments
  2. Alcon Vision LLC $840 20 payments
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $712 16 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $687 19 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $662 10 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $606 6 payments
  7. TissueTech, Inc. $476 6 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $388 4 payments
  9. Lensar, Inc. $358 1 payment
  10. Glaukos Corporation $329 4 payments
  11. Other $2,088 48 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,499 149 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MIEBO $824 8 payments
  2. Cequa $712 16 payments
  3. VABYSMO $606 6 payments
  4. XIIDRA Ophthalmology $563 7 payments
  5. LUMIGAN Eye Care $381 15 payments
  6. LENSAR LASER SYSTEM $358 1 payment
  7. XIIDRA Ophthalmology $330 5 payments
  8. Rocklatan $291 12 payments
  9. VEVYE $287 3 payments
  10. LUMIGAN Ophthalmology $265 3 payments
  11. Other $5,709 107 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

1,899

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$414,044

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

38.7%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 229 $160,354
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 84 $71,505
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 112 $49,837
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 64 $25,720
Bepotastine Besilate Generic 102 $17,429
Cyclosporine Generic 58 $16,134
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 101 $9,853
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 21 $9,403
Restasis Multidose Cyclosporine Brand 12 $7,558
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 21 $7,161

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$54,212

Of which drugs: $3,305

Medicare patients

141

Average age 76

Services billed

833

75 women, 66 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 50%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Heart failure 16%
Cancer 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 20 62 $3,305

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $290
$290 — —
VEVYE
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $259
$259 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $241
$241 — —
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $159
$159 84 —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $138
$138 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

149 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record