Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Raoul Maizel

Ophthalmology Mount Dora, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1831192954 CMS profile 1155795

17560 Highway 441, Mount Dora, FL 32757

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,517

60 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Raoul Maizel of Mount Dora, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,517 across 60 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $428 18
2024 General $331 14
2023 General $266 10
2022 General $155 7
2021 General $7,078 2
2020 General $5,020 1
2019 General $240 8

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Raoul Maizel
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Raoul Maizel were reported at $428. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Raoul Maizel Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $240 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $5,020 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $7,078 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $155 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $266 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $331 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $428 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Carl Zeiss Meditec USA, Inc. $7,063 1 payment
  2. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. $5,122 2 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $309 12 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $283 11 payments
  5. Genentech USA, Inc. $276 12 payments
  6. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $137 7 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $70 3 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $57 2 payments
  9. Shire North American Group Inc $54 3 payments
  10. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $35 2 payments
  11. Other $112 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Long term medical supply or device loan $7,063 1 payment
  2. Gift $5,122 2 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $1,332 57 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VISUCAM Fundus Cameras $12,083 2 payments
  2. Izervay $275 11 payments
  3. VABYSMO $259 11 payments
  4. EYLEA $254 10 payments
  5. Syfovre $137 7 payments
  6. CLARUS 500 Fundus Camera $102 1 payment
  7. EYLEA HD $66 2 payments
  8. LUMIGAN $57 2 payments
  9. XIIDRA Opthalmics $54 3 payments
  10. XIIDRA Ophthalmology $46 2 payments
  11. Other $218 10 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

2,654

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$333,339

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

29.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 96 $66,119
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 54 $63,888
Eylea Aflibercept Brand 16 $37,000
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 28 $36,053
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 209 $13,935
Cyclosporine Generic 30 $13,457
Latanoprost Generic 904 $13,069
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 36 $12,491
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 35 $10,275
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 63 $9,892

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,938,472

Of which drugs: $2,827,331

Medicare patients

2,236

Average age 80

Services billed

64,947

1,325 women, 911 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Chronic kidney disease 42%
Diabetes 36%
Atrial fibrillation 27%
COPD 25%
Heart failure 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 155 40,860 $1,123,278
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 231 1,512 $989,723
Injection, avacincaptad pegol, 0.1 mg J2782 Office 89 6,540 $566,893
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 11 168 $44,230
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 17 295 $37,625

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $100
$100 — 6,540
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $94
$94 — 40,860
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $60
$60 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $29
$29 — 168
XIPERE
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $16
$16 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

60 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record