Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ranbir Dhillon

Neurology Attleboro, MA Medical Doctor

NPI 1124090691 CMS profile 6076

76 Park St, Attleboro, MA 02703

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$182,241

1,807 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ranbir Dhillon of Attleboro, MA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $182,241 across 1,807 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,456 253
2024 General $15,874 290
2023 General $16,642 278
2022 General $28,325 305
2021 General $23,360 233
2020 General $26,955 179
2019 General $64,630 269

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ranbir Dhillon
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ranbir Dhillon were reported at $6,456. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Ranbir Dhillon Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $64,630 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $26,955 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $23,360 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $28,325 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $16,642 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $15,874 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $6,456 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biogen, Inc. $51,620 162 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $37,004 107 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $27,078 107 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $21,346 29 payments
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $8,623 47 payments
  6. EMD Serono, Inc. $4,640 62 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $3,932 121 payments
  8. Lundbeck LLC $2,592 103 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $2,167 105 payments
  10. SK Life Science, Inc. $2,039 67 payments
  11. Other $21,201 897 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $73,684 47 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $53,292 23 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $43,554 1,657 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $11,401 66 payments
  5. Education $311 14 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ZEPOSIA $38,016 120 payments
  2. AUBAGIO Multiple Sclerosis $20,803 43 payments
  3. VUMERITY $18,386 55 payments
  4. TECFIDERA $17,711 30 payments
  5. TYSABRI $16,193 68 payments
  6. LEMTRADA $7,200 20 payments
  7. AUBAGIO Neurology $6,554 40 payments
  8. Ozanimod $5,668 9 payments
  9. COPAXONE $4,329 5 payments
  10. AUSTEDO $2,482 17 payments
  11. Other $43,222 1,518 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 89 drugs

Part D claims

3,822

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$2,133,035

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

26.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 98 $953,033
Teriflunomide Generic 61 $188,609
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 29 $168,262
Rebif Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 12 $119,820
Avonex (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 13 $103,290
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 11 $90,130
Fingolimod Fingolimod Hcl Brand 26 $89,597
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 13 $74,599
Dimethyl Fumarate Generic 45 $60,750
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 36 $56,738

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 89 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$237,994

Of which drugs: $71,571

Medicare patients

644

Average age 72

Services billed

16,207

368 women, 276 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Depression 37%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
COPD 23%
Alzheimer's or dementia 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 24 14,386 $71,572

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 50 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPOSIA
$9,092 — —
KESIMPTA
$759 98 —
VYEPTI
$476 — —
ULTOMIRIS
$367 — —
Xeomin
$340 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 50 with Patron

Records

1,807 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Massachusetts

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record