Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ram Garg

Neurology Taylor, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1164402442 CMS profile 234159

14625 Telegraph Rd, Taylor, MI 48180

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$110,911

1,562 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Ram Garg of Taylor, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $110,911 across 1,562 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $3,160 183
2023 General $12,065 282
2022 General $27,661 259
2021 General $20,411 283
2020 General $22,553 267
2019 General $25,060 288

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ram Garg
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ram Garg were reported at $0. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Ram Garg Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $25,060 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $22,553 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $20,411 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $27,661 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $12,065 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $3,160 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $0 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $26,803 100 payments
  2. Eisai Inc. $25,157 95 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $11,902 57 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $11,260 31 payments
  5. SK Life Science, Inc. $9,161 43 payments
  6. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $6,890 103 payments
  7. Biogen, Inc. $2,579 153 payments
  8. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,545 16 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $2,116 137 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,018 149 payments
  11. Other $10,480 678 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $60,177 36 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $24,316 1,482 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $11,535 9 payments
  4. Honoraria $9,550 6 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $5,174 24 payments
  6. Education $159 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. UBRELVY Neuroscience $27,764 46 payments
  2. Fycompa Neurology $25,120 93 payments
  3. UBRELVY Neuroscience $9,438 21 payments
  4. AUBAGIO Multiple Sclerosis $8,137 24 payments
  5. XCOPRI $7,044 11 payments
  6. AUSTEDO $6,322 48 payments
  7. QULIPTA $5,703 46 payments
  8. AUBAGIO Neurology $3,713 30 payments
  9. FYCOMPA Neurology $2,505 14 payments
  10. Cenobamate $1,575 1 payment
  11. Other $21,603 1,407 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 166 drugs

Part D claims

11,196

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$2,611,676

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

26.7%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 37 $328,963
Betaseron Interferon Beta-1b Brand 28 $257,736
Tysabri Natalizumab Brand 30 $247,807
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 25 $243,893
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 124 $191,713
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 27 $174,254
Fingolimod Fingolimod Hcl Brand 19 $122,147
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 62 $120,393
Avonex (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 12 $101,674
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 11 $93,067

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 166 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$254,393

Of which drugs: $39,036

Medicare patients

404

Average age 68

Services billed

17,494

216 women, 188 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 41%
Depression 38%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
COPD 32%
Heart failure 31%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 15 11,552 $2,586
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, up to 125 mg J2930 Office 14 344 $1,218

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Nayzilam
$242 27 —
TYSABRI
$218 30 —
Briviact
$213 124 —
INGREZZA
$190 — —
FYCOMPA
$182 69 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,562 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record