Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rajiv Punjya

Cardiovascular Disease Tracy, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1881632263 CMS profile 311889

1530 Bessie Ave, #101, Tracy, CA 95376

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$491,979

1,500 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rajiv Punjya of Tracy, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $491,979 across 1,500 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $57,479 188
2024 General $73,306 185
2023 General $110,001 244
2022 General $121,611 233
2021 General $55,096 272
2020 General $31,824 183
2019 General $42,662 195

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rajiv Punjya
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rajiv Punjya were reported at $57,479. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Rajiv Punjya Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $42,662 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $31,824 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $55,096 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $121,611 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $110,001 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $73,306 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $57,479 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $213,054 186 payments
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $45,938 152 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $45,161 137 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $43,577 97 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $37,974 122 payments
  6. Amarin Pharma Inc. $27,429 70 payments
  7. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $27,325 79 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $14,393 61 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $12,447 64 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $4,608 42 payments
  11. Other $20,074 490 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $418,680 187 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $35,618 78 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $35,000 1,211 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,204 3 payments
  5. Education $477 21 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $133,301 147 payments
  2. XARELTO $45,861 151 payments
  3. FARXIGA $36,756 92 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $32,687 105 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $31,300 35 payments
  6. NEXLETOL $27,325 79 payments
  7. NEXLIZET $26,897 29 payments
  8. Vascepa $20,591 33 payments
  9. VERQUVO $16,388 65 payments
  10. Repatha $14,182 48 payments
  11. Other $59,394 873 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 80 drugs

Part D claims

12,577

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$4,434,163

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

35.4%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 725 $904,847
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 556 $674,383
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 559 $643,664
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 335 $398,773
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 136 $259,219
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 155 $230,597
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 186 $199,322
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 167 $177,446
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 84 $160,833
Camzyos Mavacamten Brand 19 $153,130

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 80 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$965,397

Of which drugs: $21,597

Medicare patients

1,707

Average age 76

Services billed

13,960

882 women, 825 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 72%
Diabetes 49%
Arthritis 48%
Chronic kidney disease 44%
Heart failure 41%
Atrial fibrillation 33%
COPD 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 116 472 $2,296
Injection, aminophyllin, up to 250 mg J0280 Office 37 38 $241

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Ozempic
$24,369 155 —
JARDIANCE
$14,279 725 —
XARELTO
$6,954 556 —
VERQUVO
$4,265 40 —
MOUNJARO
$343 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

1,500 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record