Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rajiv Ahuja

Internal Medicine Fremont, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1962460782 CMS profile 43024

674 Mowry Ave, Fremont, CA 94536

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,223

655 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rajiv Ahuja of Fremont, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,223 across 655 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,810 79
2024 General $1,616 70
2023 General $1,511 74
2022 General $1,950 106
2021 General $2,273 136
2020 General $1,628 89
2019 General $1,435 101

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rajiv Ahuja
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rajiv Ahuja were reported at $1,810. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Rajiv Ahuja Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,435 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,628 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,273 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,950 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,511 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,616 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,810 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,154 175 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $861 43 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $857 42 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $741 33 payments
  5. Exact Sciences Corporation $580 22 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $563 36 payments
  7. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $547 29 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $489 25 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $479 19 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $473 17 payments
  11. Other $4,478 214 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,102 651 payments
  2. Education $121 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,745 135 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,633 133 payments
  3. VERQUVO $730 34 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $637 28 payments
  5. Cologuard Collection Kit $580 22 payments
  6. FARXIGA $570 28 payments
  7. XARELTO $544 34 payments
  8. ZORYVE $497 27 payments
  9. STEGLATRO $474 24 payments
  10. Vascepa $435 23 payments
  11. Other $8,154 409 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 154 drugs

Part D claims

13,167

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$965,506

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

16.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 130 $133,356
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 123 $132,887
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 125 $94,692
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 62 $67,536
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 30 $48,491
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 37 $39,818
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 50 $35,001
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 52 $33,893
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 28 $32,633
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 31 $29,911

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 154 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$294,350

Of which drugs: $328

Medicare patients

329

Average age 75

Services billed

2,807

169 women, 160 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Heart failure 75%
Diabetes 64%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Arthritis 30%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Alzheimer's or dementia 15%
Atrial fibrillation 12%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $170
  • Lilly USA, LLC $98
$269 123 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $131
$131 30 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $113
$113 62 —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $105
$105 11 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $91
$91 12 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

655 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record