Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rajeev Batra

Internal Medicine Silver Spring, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1003918228 CMS profile 733925

11120 New Hampshire Ave Ste 300, Silver Spring, MD 20904

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,082

354 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rajeev Batra of Silver Spring, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,082 across 354 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,177 52
2024 General $1,223 56
2023 General $1,265 61
2022 General $1,364 71
2021 General $660 35
2020 General $207 12
2019 General $1,185 67

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rajeev Batra
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rajeev Batra were reported at $1,177. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Rajeev Batra Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,185 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $207 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $660 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,364 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,265 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,223 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,177 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $848 48 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $710 32 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $590 27 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $511 27 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $444 22 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $409 23 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $370 24 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $357 18 payments
  9. Medtronic, Inc. $348 3 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $262 15 payments
  11. Other $2,236 115 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,977 346 payments
  2. Education $106 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $594 26 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $439 23 payments
  3. MOUNJARO $411 21 payments
  4. Kerendia $370 24 payments
  5. TRULICITY $364 21 payments
  6. JARDIANCE Diabetes $335 19 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $333 18 payments
  8. ENTRESTO $284 14 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $274 14 payments
  10. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $248 14 payments
  11. Other $6,121 309 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 134 drugs

Part D claims

9,859

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,506,055

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 206 $279,008
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 172 $213,433
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 128 $163,442
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 81 $113,809
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 100 $111,919
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 88 $104,804
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 44 $66,420
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 35 $62,931
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 31 $51,495
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 36 $32,754

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 134 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$514,154

Of which drugs: $7,817

Medicare patients

424

Average age 73

Services billed

6,166

233 women, 191 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 74%
Arthritis 38%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Heart failure 19%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Depression 13%
Osteoporosis 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 78 78 $6,300
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 59 248 $1,292

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $111
$111 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $108
$108 206 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $104
$104 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $101
$101 172 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $69
$69 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

354 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record