Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rachel Crowley

Physician Assistant, Medical Paducah, KY Physician Assistant

NPI 1487801114 CMS profile 11037179

2601 Kentucky Ave, Suite 301, Paducah, KY 42003

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,492

567 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rachel Crowley of Paducah, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,492 across 567 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Physician Assistant, Medical profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,051 112
2024 General $1,746 101
2023 General $1,266 88
2022 General $1,611 131
2021 General $1,818 135

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rachel Crowley
  • Physician Assistant, Medical median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant, Medical
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rachel Crowley were reported at $2,051. Among 16,675 Physician Assistant, Medical profiles paid that year, the median was $214 and the middle half received between $62 and $755.

Show as a table
Year Rachel Crowley Physician Assistant, Medical median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $61 $19–$193 $163
2020 $0 $20 $14–$64 $114
2021 $1,818 $156 $41–$563 $132
2022 $1,611 $185 $55–$649 $149
2023 $1,266 $199 $58–$717 $160
2024 $1,746 $206 $62–$740 $164
2025 $2,051 $214 $62–$755 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,643 138 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $939 78 payments
  3. Eisai Inc. $480 16 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $472 33 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $452 32 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $451 35 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $445 28 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $437 13 payments
  9. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $303 16 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $260 17 payments
  11. Other $2,609 161 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,492 567 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UBRELVY $954 78 payments
  2. QULIPTA $700 52 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $607 52 payments
  4. Ozempic $606 53 payments
  5. Leqembi $469 15 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $355 28 payments
  7. BREZTRI $335 6 payments
  8. FARXIGA $325 5 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $308 4 payments
  10. Auvelity $244 12 payments
  11. Other $6,401 435 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 113 drugs

Part D claims

4,388

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$600,112

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

26.5%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 84 $108,516
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 78 $77,418
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 88 $69,229
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 49 $48,139
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 43 $36,509
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 30 $29,401
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 39 $27,603
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 24 $26,517
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 22 $24,379
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 18 $17,961

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 113 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$89,961

Of which drugs: $888

Medicare patients

312

Average age 75

Services billed

2,585

170 women, 142 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 59%
Chronic kidney disease 54%
Depression 48%
Diabetes 46%
COPD 39%
Osteoporosis 34%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 50 147 $748
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 44 228 $73
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 29 42 $38
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 12 56 $29

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Leqembi
  • Eisai Inc. $256
$256 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $152
$152 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $90
  • Lilly USA, LLC $28
$118 88 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $100
$100 12 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $68
$68 84 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

567 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record