Who Paid My Doc
Quinta Nfor
Nurse Practitioner New Berlin, WI Nurse Practitioner
NPI 1164808317 CMS profile 10494618
12555 W National Ave Ste 200, New Berlin, WI 53151
General payments
$11,185
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Quinta Nfor of New Berlin, WI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,185 across 564 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
5 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $1,693 | 74 | |
| 2024 | General | $2,307 | 113 | |
| 2023 | General | $2,424 | 125 | |
| 2022 | General | $2,473 | 121 | |
| 2021 | General | $2,289 | 131 |
Beside peers
- Quinta Nfor
- Nurse Practitioner median
- Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Quinta Nfor were reported at $1,693. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.
Show as a table
| Year | Quinta Nfor | Nurse Practitioner median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $50 | $22–$97 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $40 | $16–$108 | $114 |
| 2021 | $2,289 | $135 | $40–$426 | $132 |
| 2022 | $2,473 | $152 | $48–$470 | $149 |
| 2023 | $2,424 | $166 | $54–$529 | $160 |
| 2024 | $2,307 | $173 | $55–$556 | $164 |
| 2025 | $1,693 | $174 | $55–$557 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 58 drugsPart D claims
1,364
Drug cost
$68,040
Branded share of claims
15.1%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eliquis Apixaban | Brand | 28 | $15,951 | |
| Tradjenta Linagliptin | Brand | 14 | $9,383 | |
| Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol | Brand | 12 | $7,216 | |
| Myrbetriq Mirabegron | Brand | 13 | $5,496 | |
| Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa | Brand | 12 | $4,770 | |
| Novolog Flexpen Insulin Aspart | Brand | 31 | $4,427 | |
| Autoshield Duo Pen Needle Pen Needle,dual Safety,diabetc | Brand | 11 | $1,099 | |
| Atorvastatin Calcium | Generic | 82 | $1,088 | |
| Telmisartan | Generic | 13 | $1,086 | |
| Fenofibrate Fenofibrate Nanocrystallized | Brand | 18 | $982 |
The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 58 counted.
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Payments and prescribing
First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.
| Product | Paid by | Related payments | Part D claims | Part B services |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JARDIANCE |
|
$261 | — | — |
| LOKELMA |
|
$168 | — | — |
| VALTOCO |
|
$162 | — | — |
| REXULTI |
|
$151 | — | — |
| Austedo XR |
|
$137 | — | — |
A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.
See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with PatronRecords
564 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Nurse Practitioner in Wisconsin
Jodi Strong
Nurse Practitioner · Stevens Point, WI
Jo Ellen Frawley
Nurse Practitioner · Prairie Du Sac, WI
Trisha Wilcox
Nurse Practitioner · Milwaukee, WI
Sally Bowa
Nurse Practitioner · Green Bay, WI
Christina Sauld
Nurse Practitioner · Milwaukee, WI
Melissa Wendell
Nurse Practitioner · Wausau, WI
Related records
Nurse Practitioner in Wisconsin
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Nurse Practitioner
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Wisconsin
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.