Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Pratap Chand

Neurology Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1336295674 CMS profile 15105

1225 S Grand Blvd, Saint Louis, MO 63104

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$138,971

220 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$35,665 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Pratap Chand of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $138,971 across 220 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $35,665 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $24,105 29
2024 General $21,886 23
2023 General $43,069 63
2022 General $2,351 11
2021 General $3,792 6
2020 General $9,560 14
2019 General $34,208 74

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Pratap Chand
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Pratap Chand were reported at $24,105. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Pratap Chand Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $34,208 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $9,560 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $3,792 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $2,351 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $43,069 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $21,886 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $24,105 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $96,105 128 payments
  2. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc $14,509 20 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $10,816 21 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $6,651 10 payments
  5. US WorldMeds, LLC $5,513 25 payments
  6. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,642 3 payments
  7. Biogen, Inc. $1,272 1 payment
  8. Abbott Laboratories $212 3 payments
  9. Medtronic, Inc. $160 4 payments
  10. Medtronic USA, Inc. $42 1 payment
  11. Other $51 4 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $67,590 32 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $47,360 12 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $13,908 67 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $6,492 104 payments
  5. Honoraria $3,520 2 payments
  6. Education $101 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INGREZZA Neuropsychiatry $87,770 110 payments
  2. INBRIJA $14,214 15 payments
  3. INGREZZA Neurology $8,276 17 payments
  4. AUSTEDO $6,574 9 payments
  5. APOKYN $5,513 25 payments
  6. Xadago $5,398 24 payments
  7. MYOBLOC $5,398 24 payments
  8. GENERAL DBS Pain Management $3,675 4 payments
  9. GOCOVRI $3,642 3 payments
  10. GENERAL DBS Dbs $2,626 5 payments
  11. Other $3,927 22 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

1,535

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,248,826

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

61%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 95 $757,460
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 43 $252,758
Gammaplex Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga 0-50 Brand 16 $158,779
Neupro Rotigotine Brand 16 $13,788
Xadago Safinamide Mesylate Brand 12 $13,452
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 427 $12,822
Rasagiline Mesylate Generic 59 $8,168
Ongentys Opicapone Brand 12 $7,917
Carbidopa-Levodopa Er Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 161 $5,022
Rivastigmine Generic 26 $3,556

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$44,293

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

227

Average age 71

Services billed

700

98 women, 129 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 55%
Depression 42%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Alzheimer's or dementia 23%
Heart failure 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
INGREZZA
  • Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $21,886
$21,886 95 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

220 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record