Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Piyush Patel

Family Medicine Columbus, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1629011283 CMS profile 345493

5363 Veterans Pkwy, Columbus, GA 31904

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,247

457 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Piyush Patel of Columbus, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,247 across 457 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $615 40
2024 General $644 33
2023 General $1,161 67
2022 General $1,113 70
2021 General $1,515 84
2020 General $1,322 78
2019 General $3,876 85

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Piyush Patel
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Piyush Patel were reported at $615. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Piyush Patel Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,876 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,322 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,515 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,113 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,161 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $644 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $615 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $2,464 9 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,151 62 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $810 37 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $809 35 payments
  5. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $746 55 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $424 32 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $410 16 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $333 26 payments
  9. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $303 21 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $296 22 payments
  11. Other $2,501 142 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,833 452 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $2,400 4 payments
  3. Education $14 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LINZESS $2,520 11 payments
  2. Kerendia $810 37 payments
  3. FARXIGA $790 38 payments
  4. APTIOM $676 50 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $596 29 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $325 11 payments
  7. ENTRESTO $254 19 payments
  8. TRULICITY $240 19 payments
  9. Ozempic $234 15 payments
  10. BREZTRI $216 9 payments
  11. Other $5,267 334 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 385 drugs

Part D claims

140,880

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$4,417,338

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

17.7%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 4,051 $692,856
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 346 $224,085
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 997 $194,460
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 382 $184,824
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 180 $115,682
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 41 $103,327
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 502 $97,429
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 14 $94,494
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 12 $87,912
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 295 $87,669

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 385 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$506,631

Of which drugs: $582

Medicare patients

812

Average age 80

Services billed

16,012

529 women, 283 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Alzheimer's or dementia 53%
Diabetes 51%
Depression 45%
Chronic kidney disease 44%
Heart failure 34%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 18 18 $394

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $124
$124 45 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $105
$105 295 —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $94
$94 68 —
REXULTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $35
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $14
$49 54 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $40
$40 36 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

457 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record