Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Phylicia Bonavida

Nurse Practitioner, Family Princeton, ME Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1710456439 CMS profile 11171033

136 Mill St, Princeton, ME 04668

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,550

85 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Phylicia Bonavida of Princeton, ME is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,550 across 85 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $227 11
2024 General $615 33
2023 General $340 19
2022 General $250 14
2021 General $118 8

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Phylicia Bonavida
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Phylicia Bonavida were reported at $227. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Phylicia Bonavida Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $118 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $250 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $340 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $615 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $227 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Lundbeck LLC $347 15 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $207 12 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $166 9 payments
  4. Exact Sciences Corporation $131 7 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $111 7 payments
  6. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $84 5 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $81 5 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $68 4 payments
  9. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $58 4 payments
  10. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $57 3 payments
  11. Other $239 14 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,516 83 payments
  2. Education $20 1 payment
  3. Debt forgiveness $14 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. REXULTI Psychiatry $347 15 payments
  2. Ozempic $174 10 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $152 9 payments
  4. Cologuard Collection Kit $131 7 payments
  5. ELIQUIS $121 7 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $121 7 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $111 7 payments
  8. REXULTI Psychiatry $84 5 payments
  9. VYVANSE $68 4 payments
  10. SOLIQUA 100/33 $58 4 payments
  11. Other $712 43 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 82 drugs

Part D claims

3,103

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$290,247

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

22.7%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 82 $70,905
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 51 $61,449
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 43 $38,712
Emgality Syringe Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 12 $24,036
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 19 $12,738
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 12 $12,478
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 14 $11,945
Incruse Ellipta Umeclidinium Bromide Brand 12 $6,961
Potassium Chloride Generic 29 $4,575
Lantus Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 37 $3,925

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 82 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 5 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$445

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

23

Average age 73

Services billed

50

12 women, 11 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 70%
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 48%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $170
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $55
$225 — —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $52
$52 19 —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $40
$40 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $38
$38 43 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $31
$31 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

85 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Maine

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record